Source: DGNews | Posted 2 years ago
Intravitreal Triamcinolone Effective for Diabetic Macular Oedema
SAN FRANCISCO -- November 3, 2009 -- Triamcinolone may be effective treatment
option in patients with advanced diabetic macular oedema (DME) who have failed
standard treatment fails, according to a study published in the November issue
of the journal Ophthalmology.
The 5-year study based out of the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,
found that intravitreal triamcinolone effectively improved vision in patients
with DME whose eyes had continued to deteriorate despite receiving standard
laser treatment.
“The majority of patients who improved with intravitreal triamcinolone after
initial treatment continued to enjoy better vision at the 5-year conclusion of
our clinical trial, and no new safety concerns were found in these patients,”
said lead researcher Mark Gillies, PhD, University of Sydney.
“We believe treatment with IVTA may be considered in carefully selected
advanced DME patients when standard treatment has failed to improve vision,” he
added.
A total of 69 eyes (41 patients) were entered into the study, with 34 eyes
initially receiving active treatment and 35 eyes receiving placebo. Five-year
data were available for 44 of 67 eyes (66%). For the 23 eyes with missing
5-year data, of which 13 received placebo and 10 received IVTA, the last
observation was carried forward.
Patients received an intravitreal injection of 0.1 ml of 40 mg/ml triamcinolone
acetonide with adjunctive laser therapy where appropriate.
In the first 3 months after treatment, the patients initially treated with both
intravitreal triamcinolone and laser showed significantly better gains in
vision than control group patients, who were treated with laser only. After 2
years, patients in the original control group were also treated with
intravitreal triamcinolone.
The beneficial effects persisted in most intravitreal triamcinolone-treated
patients throughout the 5-year study; however, 80%t of patients in the initial
intravitreal triamcinolone group developed elevated intraocular pressure and
56% required glaucoma therapy. Also, two-thirds of all patients required
cataract surgery during the study period.
Similar outcomes have been noted in other studies of steroid-based treatment
and thus were not considered new safety concerns by Dr. Gillies’ group.
SOURCE: American Academy of Ophthalmology



Comments