Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Multiple Sclerosis
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Multiple Sclerosis
    TopAbstracts in Multiple Sclerosis 11/26/2009 - (DGNews)
    Women With MS No More Likely to Have Pregnancy Complications Than General Population - (DGNews)
    MS More Aggressive in Children but Slower to Cause Disability Than in Adults - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Multiple Sclerosis 11/12/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Multiple Sclerosis 10/29/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Multiple Sclerosis
    • Selecting Immunomodulating Therapy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
    • Delaying the Conversion of Clinically Isolated Syndrome to Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Through Early Intervention With Disease-Modifying Therapy
    • Delaying Disease Progression in Patients With MS Who Become Nonresponsive to Established Disease-Modifying Therapies
    • Multiple Sclerosis: Tempering Disabilities and Decline--Fundamentals for Managed Markets
      Evidence-Based Update for NPs and PAs in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Multiple Sclerosis
        Encephalomyelitis Mimicking Multiple Sclerosis Associated with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation
        Progressive Primary Form of Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical and Radiological Improvement with Methylprednisolone in Continuous Pulsetherapy in One Case for 16 Years
        Burrowing of Urinary Bladder Wall by the Tip of a Size 22 Fr Silicone Foley Catheter in an Adult Male Patient With Multiple Sclerosis and Suprapubic Cystostomy: Should Caution be Exercised in Using a Size 22 Fr Silicone Foley Catheter for Long-Term Drainage of Neuropathic Bladder?
        Central Auditory Evaluation in Multiple Sclerosis: Case Report
        Recurrent Acute Hepatitis in Patient Receiving Pulsed Methylprednisolone for Multiple Sclerosis

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > multiple sclerosis > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague

        DGNews


        Multiple Sclerosis Drug, Copaxone (Glatiramer Acetate), Does Not Generate Neutralizing Antibodies

        Of the Immunomodulating Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Copaxone Is the Only Therapy Proven Not to Develop Antibodies That Could Affect Efficacy

        KANSAS CITY, MO -- March 27, 2003 -- Three studies of CopaxoneŽ (glatiramer acetate injection) showed the immunomodulating treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) produced antibodies with no impact on its treatment effect.

        Most people with relapsing-remitting MS develop the disease in their late 20s or early 30s. As a chronic disease, people can expect to require treatment for decades. Therefore, researchers have been reviewing studies to determine if any of the immunomodulating drugs developed neutralizing antibodies that would affect the drug's efficacy. Of the different types of antibodies seen with the immunomodulating drugs, some are binding, while others are neutralizing.

        Neutralizing antibodies in the three interferon-beta treatments currently approved in the United States were the subject of an article in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2002:73:148-153, Bertolotto, et al. The article concluded that, "Neutralizing antibodies can appear early during the course of MS treatment, persist for several years before disappearing, decrease interferon-beta bioavailability, and reduce or abolish the clinical efficacy of interferon-beta."

        Copaxone (glatiramer acetate injection) is a different approach to the treatment of MS. In a paper published in the Journal of Neuroimmunology 2001:115(1-2)152-160, Brenner, et al., looked at three studies on Copaxone to determine if the antibodies produced during treatment impacted clinical efficacy. The three studies were the Bornstein, et al., pilot trial in 1987, Johnson, et al., pivotal trial in 1995, and the Meiner et al., long-term safety study in 1997.

        "The study concluded all patients treated with Copaxone developed glatiramer acetate-reactive antibodies. These antibodies were not found to be neutralizing and did not interfere with the ability of the drug to work, nor did they induce any adverse reactions. The key is to determine if these antibodies affect the drug's ability to work," said Corey Ford, M.D., director of the Multiple Sclerosis Specialty Clinic of New Mexico, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. "This data confirmed that with Copaxone, the antibodies do not interfere with clinical efficacy. There is no neutralizing antibody issue with Copaxone."

        All beta interferons have the potential to develop neutralizing antibodies, according to the beta interferon product labels. In the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2002:73:465-469, Giovannoni, et al., stated that, "Because of the cross reactivity of the antibodies, a switch from one preparation to the other will not benefit patients while they are NAB positive."

        "If a person with relapsing-remitting MS develops neutralizing antibodies to one interferon-beta drug, then that person is likely to have neutralizing antibodies to all of the interferon-beta medications," said Dr. Ford. "That is what is referred to as cross reactivity. If a relapsing-remitting MS patient is not responding to therapy and develops neutralizing antibodies to an interferon, their neurologist should consider a non-interferon medication, such as Copaxone."

        Copaxone (glatiramer acetate injection) is indicated for the reduction of the frequency of relapses in relapsing-remitting MS. The most common side effects of Copaxone are redness, pain, swelling, itching, or a lump at the site of injection, weakness, infection, pain, nausea, joint pain, anxiety, and muscle stiffness.

        Copaxone is now approved in 42 countries worldwide, including the U.S., Canada, Australia, Israel and all the European countries. In Europe, Copaxone is marketed by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and Aventis Pharma. In North America, Copaxone is marketed by Teva Neuroscience. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., headquartered in Israel, is among the top 35 pharmaceutical companies in the world. Close to 90 percent of Teva's sales are in North America and Europe. The company develops, manufactures and markets generic and branded human pharmaceuticals and active pharmaceutical ingredients. Teva's innovative R&D focuses on developing novel drugs for diseases of the central nervous system.

        Teva Pharmaceuticals USA is a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Teva Neuroscience, Inc. is a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Teva Neuroscience, Inc. markets Copaxone.

        See additional important information at http://www.copaxone.com/pi/index.html or call 1-800-887-8100 for electronic releases. For hardcopy releases, please see enclosed full prescribing information.

        Copaxone is a registered trademark of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

        This release contains forward-looking statements, which express the current beliefs and expectations of management. Such statements are based on current expectations and involve a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause Teva's future results, performance or achievements to differ significantly from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include Teva's ability to successfully develop and commercialize additional pharmaceutical products, the introduction of competitive generic products, the impact of competition from brand-name companies that sell their own generic products or successfully extend the exclusivity period of their branded products, Teva's ability to rapidly integrate the operations of acquired businesses, the availability of product liability coverage in the current insurance market, the impact of pharmaceutical industry regulation and pending legislation that could affect the pharmaceutical industry, the difficulty of predicting U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and other regulatory authority approvals, the regulatory environment and changes in the health policies and structure of various countries, acceptance and demand for new pharmaceutical products and new therapies, uncertainties regarding market acceptance of innovative products newly launched, currently being sold or in development, the impact of restructuring of clients, reliance on strategic alliances, exposure to product liability claims, dependence on patent and other protections for innovative products, fluctuations in currency, exchange and interest rates, operating results and other factors that are discussed in Teva's Annual Report on Form 20-F and its other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.


        SOURCE: Teva Neuroscience



        E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send