![]() |
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu Title: Methylphenidate (Concerta) Patch May Have Advantages in Treating ADHD: Presented at AACAP |
|
"Methylphenidate (Concerta) Patch May Have Advantages in Treating ADHD: Presented at AACAP" By Paula Moyer TORONTO, CANADA -- November 11, 2005 -- An investigational transdermal method for delivering methylphenidate (MethyPatch) may have advantages compared to an oral formulation for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), according to data presented here at the joint annual meeting of the American and Canadian Academies of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP/CACAP). "Subjects treated with the transdermal system displayed statistically significant improvements in all efficacy measures used in this study, compared with placebo-treated subjects," said principal investigator Robert L. Findling, MD. "The transdermal system was effective at reducing the symptoms of ADHD as assessed by clinicians, teachers, and parents," said Dr. Findling, who is Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, and Director, Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Cleveland Cleveland, Ohio, United States. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study, Dr. Findling and his co-investigators recruited 282 patients who were treated with the transdermal system, extended-release oral methylphenidate (Concerta), or placebo. Dummy patches and pills were used in the appropriate treatment arms. The children were 6 to 12 years old (average 8.8 years); 66.3% were boys. After randomization, the subjects underwent a 5-week dose optimization period in which drug doses were titrated. The patch comes in four sizes, associated with four doses: 1.1 mg/hour, 1.78 mg/hour, 2.21 mg/hour, and 2.97 mg/hour. The oral formulation came in four doses, also: 18 mg, 27 mg, 36 mg, and 54 mg. Response to treatment was defined by at least a 25% reduction in ADHD symptoms as measured by the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD RS-IV). Patients were also evaluated with the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I), and the Parent Global Assessment (PGA). During his presentation on October 20[th, Dr. Findling stressed that the purpose of the study was to test the efficacy of the transdermal patch and not to compare it to the once-daily oral formulation. Subjects who responded to treatment continued on the same treatment in a 2-week, double-blind, dose-maintenance period. A total of 169 completed the treatment period. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 270 patients, 96 in the transdermal arm, 89 in the oral arm, and 85 in the placebo arm. |
|
Copyright © 2009 P\S\L Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of P\S\L content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of P\S\L. P\S\L shall not be liable for any errors, omissions or delays in this content or any other content on its sites, newsletters or other publications, nor for any decisions or actions taken in reliance on such content. Go back This site is maintained by webmaster@pslgroup.com Please contact us with any comments, problems or bugs. All contents Copyright (c) 2009 P\S\L Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. |