![]() |
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu Title: Performance Status Is the Single Most Important Prognostic Factor in Elderly Patients With Lymphoma: Presented at ESMO |
|
"Performance Status Is the Single Most Important Prognostic Factor in Elderly Patients With Lymphoma: Presented at ESMO" By Chris Berrie LUGANO, SWITZERLAND -- July 11, 2007 -- For elderly patients with lymphoma, the prognostic value of their performance status score overrides all other prognostic factors. Therefore, the prognostic indices currently used commonly in the general lymphoma population may not be of particular use in elderly patients, and it may be important to incorporate other geriatric factors in the assessment. These findings, from an analysis of 731 Singapore-residents with lymphoma, were presented here on July 8th at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Conference. Principal Investigator Soon-Thye Lim, MD, Consultant Oncologist, Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore, said, "A lot of the studies are looking at patients and thinking about a cut-off age of 60 as elderly, but we know that people are living much longer these days." To better understand the characteristics and prognoses of elderly patients with lymphoma Dr. Lim and colleagues conducted a retrospective chart review of Singapore residents and compared patient characteristics across three age groups: <60 years; 61 to 74; and 75 or greater. Results showed no significant differences in histological subtypes, except for a prevalence of Hodgkin's disease among patients aged <60 years. Compared with patients < 60 years, those aged more than 60 years were more likely to present with advanced disease, extranodal involvement, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, low albumin, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 or more. There were no significant differences between the two older age groups for any of the characteristics monitored, except for ECOG PS ([P <.0001). As expected across these three patient groups, the rates of estimated 5-year survivals differed significantly: 67% versus 37% versus 22%, respectively (P <.0001). |
|
Copyright © 2009 P\S\L Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of P\S\L content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of P\S\L. P\S\L shall not be liable for any errors, omissions or delays in this content or any other content on its sites, newsletters or other publications, nor for any decisions or actions taken in reliance on such content. Go back This site is maintained by webmaster@pslgroup.com Please contact us with any comments, problems or bugs. All contents Copyright (c) 2009 P\S\L Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. |