To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu


Title: No Added Benefit When Montelukast Added to Fluticasone/Salmeterol in Secondary Asthma Measures: Presented at ATS
 "No Added Benefit When Montelukast Added to Fluticasone/Salmeterol in Secondary Asthma Measures: Presented at ATS"


By Marvin Ross TORONTO -- May 23, 2008 -- Patients with both asthma and allergic rhinitis experience significantly better lung function when they are treated with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol powder compared with montelukast sodium, according to research presented here at the 104th International Conference of the American Thoracic Society (ATS). In addition, when fluticasone/salmeterol and montelukast were combined, it did not result in any improvement in asthma symptoms compared with fluticasone/salmeterol alone, according to results of the 4-week, randomised, double-blind, triple-dummy, parallel-group trial. Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray was also superior to montelukast for control of allergic rhinitis. These results were presented on May 18 by Nancy Ostrom, Co-Director, Allergy & Asthma Medical Group and Research Center, San Diego, California, and colleagues. Subjects were aged at least 15 years, had at least a 3-month history of persistent asthma, prior and current use of an asthma therapy with no change in regimen in the month prior to the first visit, a diagnosis of rhinitis with seasonal onset of allergy symptoms during each of the previous 2 relevant allergy seasons, and a positive skin test reaction to a relevant seasonal allergen. Study patients had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV[1) between 65% and 95% at the first visit. During the 7 days immediately preceding the second visit, patients experienced at least 3 days when albuterol was required or had a symptom score of at least 2 on at least 3 days using a scale of 0 to 5, and had a diary Daytime Nasal Symptom Score of at least 6 on each of 4 or more days.

    Patients were randomised into 4 groups and treated for 4 weeks during a pollen season: (1) fluticasone/salmeterol 100/50 mcg BID plus fluticasone aqueous spray 200 mcg QD; (2) fluticasone/salmeterol 100/50 mcg BID plus montelukast 10 mg QD; (3) fluticasone/salmeterol 100 mcg/50 mcg BID; and (4) montelukast 10 mg QD.

    Treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol produced significant improvements in morning peak expiratory flow measures compared with montelukast (P < .01).

    No overall additional asthma control was observed when montelukast was added to fluticasone/salmeterol. Secondary asthma measures (FEV1, symptom-free days, and rescue-free days) were significantly improved with fluticasone/salmeterol compared with montelukast monotherapy (P < .001).

    Addition of montelukast to fluticasone/salmeterol produced no benefit in secondary asthma measures. Fluticasone/salmeterol plus fluticasone was superior to fluticasone/salmeterol plus montelukast in improving total nasal symptom scores (P < .001).

    No differences were seen in adverse events between the treatment arms and reports of asthma exacerbations were low.

    The researchers concluded that asthma control was superior with fluticasone/salmeterol 100/50 mcg BID compared with montelukast 10 mg QD.

    In addition, they said that fluticasone/salmeterol was statistically equivalent to fluticasone/salmeterol plus montelukast. Fluticasone/salmeterol plus fluticasone aqueous spray was also superior to fluticasone/salmeterol plus montelukast for seasonal allergic rhinitis, they added.


    [Presentation title: In Subjects With Both Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis, Montelukast Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Provides No Additional Clinical Improvements in Overall Asthma Control. Poster E41]






Copyright © 2009 P\S\L Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of P\S\L content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of P\S\L. P\S\L shall not be liable for any errors, omissions or delays in this content or any other content on its sites, newsletters or other publications, nor for any decisions or actions taken in reliance on such content.



Go back

This site is maintained by webmaster@pslgroup.com
Please contact us with any comments, problems or bugs.
All contents Copyright (c) 2009 P\S\L Consulting Group Inc.
All rights reserved.