Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Hypertension
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Hypertension
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 07/01/2009 - (DGNews)
    Certain Biomarkers Have Limitations in Predicting Cardiovascular Events - (DGNews)
    Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: prospective cohort study - (BMJ)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 06/24/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 06/17/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Hypertension
    Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: The Masquerader
    Innovative Strategies in Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction
    Diuretics for the Treatment of Hypertension
    Managing Hypertension: Addressing the Challenges in Special Populations

    Webcasts/CME archive

     Recent cases - Hypertension
      Medical Management of a Pregnancy Woman with Moderate Renal Insufficiency and Superimposed Preclampsia
      Malignant Hypertension and Acute Aortic Dissection Associated with Caffeine-Based Ephedra-Free Dietary Supplements: A Case Report
      Giant Right Coronary Artery Aneurysm: Case Report and Literature Review
      Normalization of Systemic Arterial Hypertension Following Removal of Posterior Fossa Hemangioblastoma: A Case Report
      Headache and Seizure on Postpartum Day 5: Late Postpartum Eclampsia

      Cases archive
        




      my personal edition > hypertension > news
      divider

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

      DGReview


      Amlodipine More Effective for Blood Pressure Reduction but Confers Similar Cardiac Outcomes to Valsartan Therapy

      Lancet

      06/18/2004
      By Joene Hendry


      Amlodipine-based therapy resulted in better initial blood pressure reduction than did valsartan-based therapy, but long term blood pressure and cardiac mortality and morbidity were similar between treatments in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk who participated in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE).

      "VALUE was designed to compare the effects of treatment regimens based on the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan or on the calcium antagonist amlodipine on cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with essential hypertension and at high risk for cardiac disease," writes Professor Stevo Julius, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, United States, and colleagues.

      The researchers assessed composite cardiac outcomes over a mean follow up of 4.2 years in 7649 patients randomised to valsartan and 7596 randomised to amlodipine. Median daily doses were 151.7 mg for valsartan and 8.5 mg for amlodipine. To achieve blood pressure control, patients could take further antihypertensive medications, except for angiotensin-receptor blockers.

      Overall, 10.6% of the valsartan group and 10.4% of the amlodipine group reached the primary composite outcome of cardiac mortality and cardiac morbidity. Secondary endpoints of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke were reported in 4.8% and 4.1%, 4.6% and 5.3%, and in 4.2% and 3.7%, respectively, in the valsartan and amlodipine groups. All-cause mortality was 11.0% in the valsartan group compared with 10.8% in the amlodipine group, and new-onset diabetes occurred in 13.1% compared with 16.4%, respectively.

      Blood pressure, after 1 month, of therapy was 4.0/2.1 mm Hg lower in the amlodipine patients versus those taking valsartan. At 6 months the difference decreased to 2.1/1.6 mm Hg. From month 6 to the end of the study blood pressure decreased by 3.0/2.5 mm Hg in the amlodipine group and by 3.3/2.6 mm Hg in the valsartan group.

      In the amlodipine group 62% reached the target blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg systolic and less than 90 mm Hg diastolic compared with 56% of the valsartan patients.

      Both treatment strategies were well tolerated with few adverse events, the authors note.

      "The amlodipine group had a significantly lower incidence of myocardial infarction and a higher rate of new-onset diabetes than in the valsartan group," the authors write, however "amlodipine-based therapy was significantly more efficacious in reducing BP [blood pressure], especially during the early phases of treatment."

      "The findings suggest that recommended BP goals need to be reached within a relatively short time (weeks rather than months), at least in patients with hypertension who are at high cardiovascular risk," the authors conclude.

      Lancet 2004;363:2022-31

      E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






      All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



      The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
         Feedback
      Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
      Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      Send