Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Hypertension
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Hypertension
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 01/07/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 12/31/2008 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 12/24/2008 - (DGNews)
    Modulation of Blood Pressure by Central Melanocortinergic Pathways - (N Engl J Med)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 12/17/2008 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Hypertension
    • Minimizing Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Dyslipidemia
    • Beta-Blockers in Hypertension - The Con Discussion
      Vaccination: A New Approach to RAAS Inhibition?
      Beta-Blockers in Hypertension - The Pro Discussion
      Which Anti-RAAS Shall We Use?

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Hypertension
        Cryptogenic Hepatic Insult, Failing Heart and Advancing Age: A Case Report.
        Chest Pain and Hypertension in an 18 Year Old Girl
        Aortic Dissection Type I in a Weightlifter with Hypertension: A Case Report
        Transient Left Ventricular Apical Ballooning and Exercise Induced Hypertension During Treadmill Exercise Testing: Is There a Common Hypersympathetic Mechanism?
        Dilation of Renal Artery Stenosis after Administration of Losartan

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > hypertension > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

        DGReview


        Amlodipine More Effective for Blood Pressure Reduction but Confers Similar Cardiac Outcomes to Valsartan Therapy

        Lancet

        06/18/2004
        By Joene Hendry


        Amlodipine-based therapy resulted in better initial blood pressure reduction than did valsartan-based therapy, but long term blood pressure and cardiac mortality and morbidity were similar between treatments in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk who participated in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE).

        "VALUE was designed to compare the effects of treatment regimens based on the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan or on the calcium antagonist amlodipine on cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with essential hypertension and at high risk for cardiac disease," writes Professor Stevo Julius, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, United States, and colleagues.

        The researchers assessed composite cardiac outcomes over a mean follow up of 4.2 years in 7649 patients randomised to valsartan and 7596 randomised to amlodipine. Median daily doses were 151.7 mg for valsartan and 8.5 mg for amlodipine. To achieve blood pressure control, patients could take further antihypertensive medications, except for angiotensin-receptor blockers.

        Overall, 10.6% of the valsartan group and 10.4% of the amlodipine group reached the primary composite outcome of cardiac mortality and cardiac morbidity. Secondary endpoints of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke were reported in 4.8% and 4.1%, 4.6% and 5.3%, and in 4.2% and 3.7%, respectively, in the valsartan and amlodipine groups. All-cause mortality was 11.0% in the valsartan group compared with 10.8% in the amlodipine group, and new-onset diabetes occurred in 13.1% compared with 16.4%, respectively.

        Blood pressure, after 1 month, of therapy was 4.0/2.1 mm Hg lower in the amlodipine patients versus those taking valsartan. At 6 months the difference decreased to 2.1/1.6 mm Hg. From month 6 to the end of the study blood pressure decreased by 3.0/2.5 mm Hg in the amlodipine group and by 3.3/2.6 mm Hg in the valsartan group.

        In the amlodipine group 62% reached the target blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg systolic and less than 90 mm Hg diastolic compared with 56% of the valsartan patients.

        Both treatment strategies were well tolerated with few adverse events, the authors note.

        "The amlodipine group had a significantly lower incidence of myocardial infarction and a higher rate of new-onset diabetes than in the valsartan group," the authors write, however "amlodipine-based therapy was significantly more efficacious in reducing BP [blood pressure], especially during the early phases of treatment."

        "The findings suggest that recommended BP goals need to be reached within a relatively short time (weeks rather than months), at least in patients with hypertension who are at high cardiovascular risk," the authors conclude.

        Lancet 2004;363:2022-31

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send