Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Ob/Gyn Other
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Ob/Gyn Other
    Presence of Nuclear Atypia Not an Indication of Progression for Low-Grade Cervical Lesions: Presented at ASCP - (DGDispatch)
    Alternative to Pap Test Does Not Appear Superior in Detecting Cervical Cancer - (DGNews)
    Oral Oestradiol Valerate and Dienogest Reduces Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, Improves Iron Metabolism: Presented at ASRM - (DGDispatch)
    Elagolix Relieves Pain From Endometriosis Without Causing Bone Loss: Presented at ASRM - (DGDispatch)
    Case Report Describes Fatal Motor Neuron Disease Following HPV Vaccination: Presented at ANA - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Ob/Gyn Other
    • Expert Perspectives on Challenges, Controversies, and Opportunities in Ovarian Cancer Therapy: The Present and the Future
    • Taking Stock of the Current Research: Which New Therapies Are Showing Promise in Ovarian Cancer?
    • Q&A Lightning Round: Expert Opinions on Unanswered Questions and Controversies in Ovarian Cancer
    • Update on DVT and PE in OB Gyn/Ortho Patients
      Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Women: Implications for Family Practice

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Ob/Gyn Other
        Effects of Growth Hormone Reduction in a Patient with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Complicated with Acromegaly
        Endometriosis Presenting as an Acute Groin Swelling: A Case Report
        Giant Ovarian Serous Cystadenoma in a Postmenopausal Woman: A Case Report
        Failure of Ultrasound to Diagnose a Giant Ovarian Cyst: A Case Report
        Female Sexual Dysfunction

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > ob/gyn other > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

        DGReview


        Operational Delivery with Vacuum Extraction Appears as Safe as Forceps Assisted Delivery

        British Medical Journal (BMJ)

        07/02/2004
        By Joene Hendry


        Vacuum extraction appears to be at least as safe as forceps delivery, according to the findings of a population based retrospective study conducted in the United States.

        "Fatal complications and outcomes (neonatal death and intracranial haemorrhage) were similar between neonates and infants from two large birth cohorts in the United States after delivery by forceps or vacuum extraction," writes Kitaw Demissie, assistant professor, Division of Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, School of Public Health, Piscataway, and colleagues.

        They compared the risk of neonatal and infant adverse outcomes between vacuum and forceps assisted deliveries in 11 639 388 singleton live births identified through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's natality and mortality birth cohort file between 1995 and 1998. The investigators also used data from 375 351 births identified through the linked natality, mortality, and hospital discharge summary birth cohort file for New Jersey from 1989 to 1993 to conduct additional assessments of neonatal morbidity.

        Delivery assisted by vacuum or forceps showed similar risk of neonatal mortality, odds ratio (OR) 0.94, after adjusting for maternal age, race, parity, education, gestational age, birth weight, diabetes, pre-existing hypertension, pregnancy induced hypertension, premature rupture of membranes, induction of labour, foetal distress, placental abruption, and intrapartum bleeding in the national cohort.

        In this group vacuum delivery was associated with a lower risk of birth injuries, OR 0.69; neonatal seizures, OR 0.78; and assisted ventilation at less than 30 minutes after birth, OR 0.94, as well as at 30 minutes or more after birth, OR 0.92, compared with forceps assisted delivery.

        In the New Jersey cohort the incidence of cephalohaematoma was higher with vacuum delivery and the incidence of facial nerve injury was higher with forceps delivery. Adjusted analyses revealed that compared with forceps, vacuum assisted delivery had an OR of 2.00 for shoulder dystocia, 1.15 for feeding difficulty, 1.27 for mechanical ventilation, but 0.78 for retinal haemorrhage.

        Analysis of maternal morbidity showed that third and fourth degree perineal tear was less likely with vacuum assisted delivery, ORs of 0.78 and 0.64, but postpartum haemorrhage was slightly more likely, OR of 1.22, compared with forceps assisted delivery.


        "Although delivery by vacuum extraction does have risks, it remains a safe alternative to forceps delivery," the authors conclude, adding "Our results underscore the need for obstetric standards in performing instrumental deliveries."

        BMJ 2004;329:24-29, doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.24

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send