Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Ob/Gyn Other
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Ob/Gyn Other
    Interpretation Time for Digital Mammograms Longer Than Film-Screen - (DGNews)
    Rosiglitazone, Pioglitazone Double the Risk of Fractures in Women - (DGNews)
    Flibanserin Improves Sex Life for Premenopausal Women With Generalised Acquired Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder: Presented at ESSM-ISSM - (DGDispatch)
    Gantry Angulation Technique Can Reduce Radiation Exposure to the Breast by 50%: Presented at RSNA - (DGDispatch)
    Nearly Three-Quarters of Symptomatic Women Are Candidates for Focused Ultrasound Fibroid Therapy: Presented at RSNA - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Ob/Gyn Other
      MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Therapy
      Use of Progesterone in 3 Challenging Cases
      Integrating Menstrual Migraine Management into Women's Healthcare
      Epidemiology and Neurobiological Aspects of Female Sexual Dysfunction
      Diagnosis and Classification of Female Sexual Dysfunction

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Ob/Gyn Other
        Bartholin's Abscess Arising Within Hidradenoma Papilliferum of the Vulva: A Case Report
        Multiple Papillae on Labia Minoraa
        Chronic Vulvocrural Dermatitis with Burning and Itching
        Ultrasound and MR-Imaging in Preoperative Evaluation of Scar Endometriosis: Two Case Reports
        Misleading Menorrhagia in a Peri-Menopausal Woman with Underlying Bowel Cancer: A Case Report

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > ob/gyn other > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

        DGReview


        Operational Delivery with Vacuum Extraction Appears as Safe as Forceps Assisted Delivery

        British Medical Journal (BMJ)

        07/02/2004
        By Joene Hendry


        Vacuum extraction appears to be at least as safe as forceps delivery, according to the findings of a population based retrospective study conducted in the United States.

        "Fatal complications and outcomes (neonatal death and intracranial haemorrhage) were similar between neonates and infants from two large birth cohorts in the United States after delivery by forceps or vacuum extraction," writes Kitaw Demissie, assistant professor, Division of Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, School of Public Health, Piscataway, and colleagues.

        They compared the risk of neonatal and infant adverse outcomes between vacuum and forceps assisted deliveries in 11 639 388 singleton live births identified through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's natality and mortality birth cohort file between 1995 and 1998. The investigators also used data from 375 351 births identified through the linked natality, mortality, and hospital discharge summary birth cohort file for New Jersey from 1989 to 1993 to conduct additional assessments of neonatal morbidity.

        Delivery assisted by vacuum or forceps showed similar risk of neonatal mortality, odds ratio (OR) 0.94, after adjusting for maternal age, race, parity, education, gestational age, birth weight, diabetes, pre-existing hypertension, pregnancy induced hypertension, premature rupture of membranes, induction of labour, foetal distress, placental abruption, and intrapartum bleeding in the national cohort.

        In this group vacuum delivery was associated with a lower risk of birth injuries, OR 0.69; neonatal seizures, OR 0.78; and assisted ventilation at less than 30 minutes after birth, OR 0.94, as well as at 30 minutes or more after birth, OR 0.92, compared with forceps assisted delivery.

        In the New Jersey cohort the incidence of cephalohaematoma was higher with vacuum delivery and the incidence of facial nerve injury was higher with forceps delivery. Adjusted analyses revealed that compared with forceps, vacuum assisted delivery had an OR of 2.00 for shoulder dystocia, 1.15 for feeding difficulty, 1.27 for mechanical ventilation, but 0.78 for retinal haemorrhage.

        Analysis of maternal morbidity showed that third and fourth degree perineal tear was less likely with vacuum assisted delivery, ORs of 0.78 and 0.64, but postpartum haemorrhage was slightly more likely, OR of 1.22, compared with forceps assisted delivery.


        "Although delivery by vacuum extraction does have risks, it remains a safe alternative to forceps delivery," the authors conclude, adding "Our results underscore the need for obstetric standards in performing instrumental deliveries."

        BMJ 2004;329:24-29, doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.24

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send