Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Ob/Gyn Other
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Ob/Gyn Other
    Blood Test Can Reduce Repeat Breast MRI in Women With Irregular Menstrual Cycles - (DGNews)
    Flibanserin Provides Multiple Benefits in Women With Low Sexual Desire: Presented at ESSM - (DGDispatch)
    ACOG Recommends Pap Tests for Cervical Cancer Screening Begin Later, With Lower Frequency - (DGNews)
    Flibanserin Effectively Treats Women With Low Libido: Presented at ESSM - (DGDispatch)
    US Panel Ups Age for Routine Breast Cancer Screening From 40 to 50 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Ob/Gyn Other
    • Expert Perspectives on Challenges, Controversies, and Opportunities in Ovarian Cancer Therapy: The Present and the Future
    • Taking Stock of the Current Research: Which New Therapies Are Showing Promise in Ovarian Cancer?
    • Q&A Lightning Round: Expert Opinions on Unanswered Questions and Controversies in Ovarian Cancer
    • Update on DVT and PE in OB Gyn/Ortho Patients
      Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Women: Implications for Family Practice

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Ob/Gyn Other
        Effects of Growth Hormone Reduction in a Patient with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Complicated with Acromegaly
        Endometriosis Presenting as an Acute Groin Swelling: A Case Report
        Giant Ovarian Serous Cystadenoma in a Postmenopausal Woman: A Case Report
        Failure of Ultrasound to Diagnose a Giant Ovarian Cyst: A Case Report
        Female Sexual Dysfunction

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > ob/gyn other > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Women With Breast Implants At Higher Risk Of Serious Conditions: Presented at NCI

        WASHINGTON, DC -- April 25, 2001 -- New findings from the largest independent study of women with breast implants, led by National Cancer Institute (NCI) researcher Dr. Louise Brinton, reveal the women suffer significantly higher rates of brain cancer and respiratory-tract cancer when compared to other female plastic surgery patients. The rates also are higher when compared to the general population.

        In an article in the May 2001 issue of Epidemiology, Dr. Brinton's team reported that women with implants had a threefold higher relative risk of dying from diseases of the respiratory-tract including lung cancer, emphysema, and pneumonia and twofold higher risk of dying from brain cancer in comparison to the control group of other plastic-surgery patients. The two groups were
        compared because they tend to come from the same economic and social backgrounds, thus neutralizing so-called "lifestyle" factors that have raised questions in other studies.

        According to a companion article published in the May issue of Annals of Epidemiology, which reported on the number of malignancies rather than mortalities, cancers of the brain and respiratory tract also were found at higher rates in women with implants. Other cancers such as cervical, vulvar and multiple myeloma likewise occurred more frequently in women with implants than in the comparison groups, but the researchers described the results for brain and respiratory-tract cancer as more unexpected and puzzling.

        In trying to understand the high incidence of brain cancer, the researchers pointed out the many "neurologic alterations" that women with implants have reported -- memory loss, cognitive dysfunction, and others -- and concluded that implants "may have been more directly involved" in those complications than has previously been suggested. They also noted that these cancers originated in the brain as opposed to the more usual occurrence of spreading to the brain from another part of the body.

        In addition to respiratory-tract cancer, women with implants died at a higher rate from pneumonia and emphysema. It is possible, the researchers suggested, that these deaths may therefore fit into a general pattern of pulmonary complications from exposure to silicone as reported in a number of other published cases in medical journals.

        On average the women were in their mid-thirties when they received implants, and all the women had their implants for at least eight years. The risk of mortality was increased among women who had their implants 15 years or longer. Nearly all previous studies of women with implants looked at the effects of devices over a shorter time period.

        The Brinton study was begun more than five years ago and is one of only a few studies to be carried out by an independent body like the National Cancer Institute. Most previous investigations have been funded by breast implant manufacturers or others with a financial interest in the outcome. This is also the first study ever to analyze the mortality rates of women with breast implants.

        Deaths from suicide also were found to be four times higher among women with implants. The NCI researchers noted that low self-esteem, often a factor in suicide attempts, "may have also contributed to the excess suicides especially if the implants did not achieve the desired effect or if problems with the implants were encountered."

        This study is part of a larger body of research being conducted at the National Cancer Institute. The NCI is conducting the research to determine the long-term health effects associated with silicone breast implants. Although implants have been linked to serious short-term complications, very little is known about their long-term effects.

        SOURCE: Command Trust Foundation




        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send