Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Ob/Gyn Other
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Ob/Gyn Other
    Vasopressin-Receptor Antagonists May Help Treat Wide Range of Conditions - (DGNews)
    Group A Beta-Haemolytic Streptococci Associated With Vulvovaginitis: Presented at ECCMID - (DGDispatch)
    Endocrine Society Releases Treatment Guidelines for Hirsutism - (DGNews)
    Breastfeeding While Taking Seizure Medicine Does Not Appear to Harm Infants - (DGNews)
    Gestational Age Alone Not Sufficient to Predict Premature Infant Survival and Disability - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Ob/Gyn Other
    Breast Problems:  Common Problems in Adults (non-pregnant)

    Webcasts/CME archive

     Recent cases - Ob/Gyn Other
      An Entrapped Shelf Pessary
      Intussusception of the Appendix Secondary to Endometriosis: A Case Report
      Giant Serous Cystadenoma Arising from an Accessory Ovary in a Morbidly Obese 11-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report
      Late Aortic Lymphocele and Residual Ovary Syndrome After Gynecological Surgery
      Mucocele of the Appendix - A Diagnostic Dilemma: A Case Report

      Cases archive
        




      my personal edition > ob/gyn other > news
      divider

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

      DGReview


      Routine Episiotomy Needs To Be Discouraged

      A DGReview of :"Does episiotomy increase perineal laceration length in primiparous women?"
      Journal of Family Practice

      12/13/2001
      By Harvey McConnell


      A number of high quality trials provide strong evidence that episiotomy should not be performed routinely during labor yet it remains common practice in more than 40 percent of deliveries in the United States.

      "This suggests the need for further educational interventions on how to attend deliveries in primiparous women without using episiotomy," declares Dr Amy Denham, and Dr Valerie King from the Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

      The clinicians point out that the episiotomy was initially based on theoretical benefit, but with little evidence supporting claims that it prevented severe perineal lacerations or pelvic floor dysfunction. However, evidence-based medicine has called the practice into question with the suggestion that episiotomy increases the risk of third- and fourth-degree lacerations.

      "A recent Cochrane review of six randomized controlled clinical trials comparing routine versus restricted use of episiotomy showed that episiotomy was associated with more second-degree perineal trauma, without significant differences in dyspareunia, severe perineal trauma, or severe pain," the clinicians point out. Similar results were seen in either mediolateral episiotomy or midline episiotomy.

      In their trial, Drs Denham and King enrolled 80 pregnant women, mean age 26.4 years, at term who had not had previous vaginal deliveries. The 62 who went on to have vaginal deliveries were included in the analysis. A majority (92 percent) had prenatal care, most (88 percent) had epidural analgesia, about one fourth (28 percent) had forceps or vacuum-assisted delivery, and a few had malpresentations. A decision whether to perform an episiotomy was left to clinical judgement.

      Among the 62 patients in the final analysis, 76 percent had a perineal laceration, with a median length of 4 cm. Five patients (8 percent) had a third-degree laceration, and one patient (2 percent) had a fourth-degree laceration. Approximately half of the patients (44 percent) had an episiotomy. The mean laceration length was 3 cm longer for patients who had an episiotomy (4.9 cm versus 1.9 cm).

      When assisted deliveries were excluded from the analysis, the association between episiotomy and laceration length remained significant.

      The researchers concluded that the study "provides weak evidence that episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Earlier higher-quality trials provide strong evidence that episiotomy should not be performed routinely. Its use should be restricted to situations in which specific clinical indications exist."
      The Journal of Family Practice, December 2001, Vol. 50, No. 12. "Does episiotomy increase perineal laceration length in primiparous women?"

      E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






      All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2008 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



      The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
         Feedback
      Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
      Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      Send