Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
HRT
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - HRT
    TopAbstracts in HRT 02/02/2010 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in HRT 01/19/2010 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in HRT 01/05/2010 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in HRT 12/22/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in HRT 12/08/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - HRT
      Issues in Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy
      How to Appropriately Counsel and Manage a Recently Menopausal Woman Worried About the Safety of Hormone Therapy
      Use of Hormone Therapy for Menopausal Symptoms

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - HRT
        Fibrinogen Storage Disease Without Hypofibrinogenemia Associated with Estrogen Therapy

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > hrt > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

        DGReview


        Increased Risks Lead To Halt In Large US Estrogen/Progestin Trial

        Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

        07/09/2002
        By Elda Hauschildt


        Researchers with the Women's Health Initiative trial have halted the estrogen plus progestin portion of the study because of apparent increases in risks for invasive breast cancer, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and pulmonary embolisms among participants.

        They list the absolute excess risks attributable to estrogen plus progestin per 10,000 person-years as: eight more invasive breast cancers, seven more CHD events, eight more strokes and eight more pulmonary embolisms.

        They also found absolute risk reductions per 10,000 person-years of six fewer colorectal cancers and five fewer hip fractures.

        "The risk-benefit profile found in this trial is not consistent with the requirements for a viable intervention for primary prevention of chronic diseases, and the results indicate that this regimen should not be initiated or continued for primary prevention of CHD," the researchers comment.

        Investigators tabulated the absolute excess risk of events included in their global index as 19 per 10,000 person years.

        The researchers, led by Dr. Jacques Rossouw of the US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, halted the trial May 31 this year after a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up. The trial was scheduled to follow the women for 8.2 years.

        It was reported that overall heath risks exceeded benefits from the use of conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 milligrams per day) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/d), combined in one tablet.

        A total of 16,608 healthy postmenopausal women with an intact uterus, recruited from 40 United States clinics, had been participating in the trial. They were enrolled between 1993 and 1998.

        Hazard ratios (HRs) for composite outcomes were found to be: 1.22 for total cardiovascular disease (arterial and venous disease), 1.03 for total cancer, 0.76 for combined fractures, 0.98 for total mortality and 1.15 for the global index.

        The researchers say the results address the important issue of whether most women with an intact uterus in the decades after menopause should consider hormone therapy to prevent chronic disease.

        They note that the Women's Health Initiative enrolled a cohort of mostly healthy, ethnically diverse women whose ages spanned almost three decades, from 50 to 79 years at baseline.

        They point out that the increased risks for cardiovascular disease and invasive breast cancer were found across racial/ethnic and age strata.

        "Hence the results are likely to be generally applicable to healthy women in this age range."
        JAMA, 2002; 288: 321-333.

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2010 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send