Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Ob/Gyn Other
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Ob/Gyn Other
    Low-Dose Oestradiol Tablets Decrease Vaginal Atrophy in Postmenopausal Women: Presented at ASRM - (DGDispatch)
    Study Finds Possible Link Between Diabetes, Pelvic Girdle Syndrome - (DGNews)
    FDA Approves Oestrogen Vaginal Cream for Moderate to Severe Postmenopausal Dyspareunia - (DGNews)
    Intravaginal Progesterone Gel May Benefit Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilisation: Presented at ASRM - (DGDispatch)
    Decreasing the Risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation for Patients Undergoing Fertility Treatments: Presented at ASRM - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Ob/Gyn Other
    • Progress in Detecting and Managing HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Brief Clinical Update
    • Evolving Role of Targeted Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Highlights of Recent Clinical Data
    • Integrating Menstrual Migraine Management into Women's Healthcare
      Epidemiology and Neurobiological Aspects of Female Sexual Dysfunction
      Diagnosis and Classification of Female Sexual Dysfunction

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Ob/Gyn Other
        Multiple Papillae on Labia Minoraa
        Chronic Vulvocrural Dermatitis with Burning and Itching
        Ultrasound and MR-Imaging in Preoperative Evaluation of Scar Endometriosis: Two Case Reports
        Misleading Menorrhagia in a Peri-Menopausal Woman with Underlying Bowel Cancer: A Case Report
        Secondary Amenorrhoea Due to Pheochromocytoma: A Case Report

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > ob/gyn other > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

        DGReview


        Laparoscopy Safe, Effective In Endometrial Cancer

        A DGReview of :"Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study."
        European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology

        09/17/2002
        By Anne MacLennan


        Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging of endometrial cancer is as safe as an open procedure, and may be considered for the endometrial malignancy that typically occurs in obese, older high-risk women.

        These are among conclusions of a prospective multicentre study in the Czech Republic that found no difference in recurrence or survival between laparoscopic and open surgery in these patients.

        The laparoscopic approach to endometrial cancer has gradually gained wider acceptance by doctors over laparotomy, the more traditional surgical treatment.

        Dr Z Holub and colleagues from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baby Friendly Hospital, Kladno, sought to report peri- and postoperative outcomes, as well as long-term results, of the technique.

        The study was done at three oncolaparoscopic centres and included 221 women who had undergone laparoscopic (177 women) or abdominal (44) hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy.

        Women with stage IA, grade one did not undergo lymphadenectomy unless they had a high-risk histologic tumor type. In 145 women with disease greater than IA or grades other than one, lymph node dissection was done.

        Mean age and weight were similar in the women in both the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, and perioperative blood loss was comparable between groups.

        Although the length of operating time for the laparoscopic surgery was significantly longer than for the laparotomy procedure (163.3 minutes versus 114.7 min), patients were discharged from hospital much earlier after the former (3.9 days; range two to 16) than the latter procedure (7.3 days; range five to 16).

        Nor was there any significant difference between the two groups in surgical complications.

        Long-term results were similar. There were no significant differences in tumour recurrence or recurrence-free survival after a median follow-up of 33.6 months for the laparoscopy and 45.2 months for the open group.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002;23(4):305-10 "Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study."

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2008 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send