Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Breast Cancer
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Breast Cancer
    TopAbstracts in Breast Cancer 10/07/2008 - (DGNews)
    Second Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer Reduces Survival Rates - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Breast Cancer 09/30/2008 - (DGNews)
    Breast Imaging Before Chemotherapy Predicts Need for Radiation: Presented at ASTRO - (DGDispatch)
    Nodal Radiation May Be Unnecessary After Mastectomy: Presented at ASTRO - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Breast Cancer

    Webcasts/CME archive

     Recent cases - Breast Cancer
      Primary Osteosarcoma of the Breast: Case Report
      A Case of Matrix-Producing Carcinoma of the Breast
      Metastatic Hurthle Cell Carcinoma of the Thyroid Presenting as a Breast Lump: A Case Report
      Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration as a Presentation of Breast Cancer - A Case Report and Review of the Literature
      Primary Lymphoma of the Breast Involving Both Axillae with Bilateral Breast Carcinoma

      Cases archive
        




      my personal edition > breast cancer > news
      divider

        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

      DGDispatch


      Survival Similar With Breast Conservation vs. Mastectomy After Nearly 20 Years: Presented at SABCS

      By Andrew Bowser

      SAN ANTONIO, TX -- December 13, 2002 -- Mastectomy and breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer are associated with similar survival rates nearly 20 years after the procedures were performed, according to results of one of the longest follow-ups to date among the seven trials that have compared the two modalities.

      There was no significant difference in survival or disease recurrence between the modalities, according to the results, which were presented here December 12th at the 25th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

      Notably, some of the patients in the breast conservation group did not have negative margins, said Matthew M. Poggi, MD, of the Radiation Oncology Branch of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, United States.

      However, while negative margins were not required for trial entry, investigators could not report whether survival was different vs. mastectomy for the women who did not have clear margins.

      "Unfortunately, due to referring patterns and inaccessibility to complete pathologic specimens, we are unable to correlate margin status with in-breast events or other cancer events," Dr. Poggi said.

      This NCI study included 247 patients with stage I-II breast cancer randomised to modified radical mastectomy, or to lumpectomy, axillary dissection and radiation therapy.

      After a median follow-up of 18.4 years, overall survival was 58 percent in the mastectomy group and 54 percent in the lumpectomy plus radiation group. In addition, disease-free survival at this follow-up point was 67 percent for mastectomy and 63 percent for lumpectomy and radiation.

      Early on, there was a significant difference in survival after second cancer events (either recurrence or second primary cancer). Probability of survival was 97 percent for mastectomy compared with 59 percent in the breast conservation group; but after the first year, the probabilities were comparable and overall survival was not statistically different, according to the investigators.

      "These findings contribute to the growing body of research that suggests that lumpectomy can be just as effective as mastectomy in treating breast cancer," Dr. Poggi said.



      E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






      All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2008 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



      The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
         Feedback
      Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
      Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      Send