Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Debbie M. Bunch
Si ce n'est pas votre Personal Edition, cliquez ici.
 
Nous Contacter | Mises à jour sans frais | Revues | Parrainer un collègue
 
 
SARS
 
   
 
RECHERCHE   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congrès
 

 EXPLORER :
   Nouvelles les plus lues
 Toutes les nouvelles  Toutes les nouvelles
 Toutes les webdiffusions / CME  Toutes les webdiffusions / CME
 Tous les cas  Tous les cas
 Tous les congrès  Tous les congrès
 Ressources médicales  Ressources médicales
 Medical  Personal Edition



Avertissement | Anonymat

 

 
 Nouvelles Récentes - SARS
    New Studies Suggest Airborne SARS Transmission Is Possible - (DGNews)
    Chest Radiographs Can Predict Risk of Death in SARS Patients - (DGNews)
    Nosocomial Methycillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Remained Stable During SARS Outbreak: Presented at ICAAC - (DGDispatch)
    SARS Survivors Show Exercise Limitations, But Psychosocial Factors May Also Be at Play: Presented at CHEST - (DGDispatch)
    - (N Engl J Med)

    Archives des nouvelles

     Webdiffusions/CME récentes

      Archives de webdiffusions/CME

       Études de cas récentes - SARS
        Fever Attribution in the SARS Outbreak
        SARS - Lessons from Two Singapore General Hospital Cases
        Chest Radiographic Findings of a Case of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in Singapore

        Archives des cas
          




        personal edition > sars > nouvelles
        divider

          Envoyez ce DGNews à un collègue par courriel

        DGNews


        Seventh US Patient Lab-Positive for SARS

        BETHESDA, MD, USA -- May 29, 2003 -- This report updates SARS cases reported worldwide and in the United States and reports a seventh laboratory-confirmed U.S. case.

        During November 1, 2002--May 28, 2003, a total of 8,240 SARS cases were reported to WHO from 28 countries, including the United States; 745 deaths (case-fatality proportion: 9.0%) have been reported (1). The 363 SARS cases identified in the United States have been reported from 41 states and Puerto Rico, with 297 (82%) cases classified as suspect SARS and 66 (18%) classified as probable SARS (more severe illnesses characterized by the presence of pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome) (2).

        Of the 66 probable SARS patients, 43 (65%) were hospitalized, and two (3%) required mechanical ventilation. No SARS-related deaths have been reported in the United States. Of 66 probable cases, 64 (97%) were attributed to international travel to areas with documented or suspected community transmission of SARS within the 10 days before illness onset; the remaining two (3%) probable cases occurred in a health-care worker who provided care to a SARS patient and a household contact of a SARS patient. Since the last update, new cases of SARS have been reported in Toronto, Canada, and CDC has reissued a travel alert for Toronto (3). Consequently, the surveillance case definition continues to include cases in persons whose illness is consistent with the clinical criteria and began within 10 days of travel to Toronto (2).

        Serologic testing for antibody to SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) has been performed for 32 (48%) probable cases and was positive for seven, six of which have been described previously as laboratory-confirmed cases. For one patient, a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay detected SARS-CoV ribonucleic acid in a sputum specimen collected 14 days after illness onset (4,5); this patient subsequently had antibody to SARS-CoV. The seventh patient, a household contact of one of the six patients with positive serology, was reported previously as a probable SARS patient on the basis of clinical and epidemiologic criteria (4). Among the seven patients, four had positive serology on or before day 12 after onset of symptoms. The other three had negative serologic tests on day 4, 6, and 14, respectively, and a positive test in the next available serum sample on day 28, 25, and 41, respectively. Serologic testing has been performed for 111 (37%) suspect cases; antibody was not detected for any of those tested.

        CDC measures SARS-CoV--specific total IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies by both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) (6). A serum specimen is reported as positive when both tests are positive. Antibodies against other human and nonhuman coronaviruses do not react in these assays, and tests on sera from 384 persons without SARS-CoV infection all were negative. These findings indicate that SARS-CoV has emerged recently within the population and that the serologic methods are specific for detection of antibody against SARS-CoV and have a low false-positive rate.

        Rapid identification of SARS-CoV as the etiologic agent of SARS and extensive international collaboration has aided in the development of this diagnostic test. Of the 66 probable SARS cases, convalescent serum has been collected for 40 (61%). Testing of convalescent serum is invaluable in confirming infection with SARS-CoV, and every effort should be made to obtain follow-up specimens >21 days after onset of illness.

        Reported by: State and local health departments. SARS Investigative Team, CDC.

        References

        1. World Health Organization. Cumulative number of reported cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Available at http://www.who.int/csr/sarscountry/2003_05_28/en.

        2. CDC. Updated interim U.S. case definition of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/casedefinition.htm.

        3. CDC. Travel alert reinstated: Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/travel/other/sars_can.htm.

        4. CDC. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and coronavirus testing---United States, 2003. MMWR 2003;52:297--302.

        5. CDC. Update: severe acute respiratory syndrome---United States, 2003. MMWR 2003;52:357--60.
        Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1953--66.


        SOURCE: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: MMWR Weekly, May 30, 2003 / 52(21);500-501



        Envoyez ce DGNews à un collègue par courriel   Version pour imprimante






        Sommaire Copyright (c) 1995-2010 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. Tous droits réservés.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send