Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Rheumatoid Arthritis
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Rheumatoid Arthritis
    TopAbstracts in Rheumatoid Arthritis 11/26/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Rheumatoid Arthritis 11/12/2009 - (DGNews)
    Anti-TNF Treatment Does Not Increase Cancer Risk in Patients With RA - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Rheumatoid Arthritis 10/29/2009 - (DGNews)
    Tocilizumab Plus Methotrexate Provides Sustained Benefits in Patients With RA: Presented at ACR/ARHP - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Rheumatoid Arthritis
      Comorbidity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: What are the Real Concerns?
      Advances in Basic Science
      Quantitatively-Driven Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis
      Cancer, Liver, Infections, Cardiovascular Disease, and other Biologic Agents
      Rheumatoid Arthritis: Clinical Aspects, Outcomes, and Measures

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Rheumatoid Arthritis
        Mesenteric Rheumatoid Nodules Masquerading as an Intra-Abdominal Malignancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
        Co-Existence of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Multilineage Dysplasia and Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated T-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorder in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis
        Patient with Hepatitis B and Rheumatoid Arthritis
        Complete Heart Block and Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthtritis: A Case Report
        Limited Wegener's Granulomatosis Presenting as Lung Nodules in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > rheumatoid arthritis > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Once Weekly 50 mg Etanercept As Good As Twice Weekly 25 Mg In Rheumatoid Arthritis: Presented at EULAR

        By Adrian Burton

        LISBON, PORTUGAL -- June 20, 2003 -- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who self-inject etanercept twice weekly need now do so once only - with double the dose, according to findings of an American study.

        The results were presented at the Annual European Congress of Rheumatology here in Lisbon yesterday.

        "The question was, can you give etanercept once a week at 50 mg and get the same effect as 25 mg twice a week?" explained Roy Fleischmann, Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas. "What we found was that they are equivalent."

        The news should help patients who find difficulty in administering themselves injections.

        In this double-blind, placebo controlled trial, 420 patients with active RA were randomised into one of three groups: 53 received a placebo (for 8 weeks before receiving standard 25 mg etanercept treatment), 214 received etanercept 50 mg once a week, and 153 received the same drug in two weekly 25 mg injections. After 8 and 16 weeks, the severity of the patients' disease was measured using American College of Rheumatology (ARC) criteria, the non-inferiority of the drug regimens determined by comparing how many patients reached a target ARC 20 response.

        Compared to 19% of the placebo group, 50% of the 50 mg group reached ACR 20 (P<0.001), while 49% of the standard 2x25 mg group achieved the same at 8 weeks. There was therefore no difference in the primary endpoint between the two dose regimens.

        At 16 weeks, no statistical differences were seen between the continued improvement of patients (55% and 63% of the 50 mg and 2x25 mg reached ACR 20 by week 16). Neither were any differences seen in components of the ACR evaluation. "Of course, versus placebo they were significantly different," explained Dr. Fleischmann.

        Adverse events were also comparable at both evaluation dates, with no statistical differences found between the two treatment groups for any of the normal side effects, including asthenia, diarrhoea, headache, injection site reaction, nausea, rash or upper respiratory tract infection.

        "There are patients who would much rather inject once a week rather than twice a week," explained Dr. Fleischmann. "And now they can."



        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send