Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Cervical Cancer
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Cervical Cancer
    TopAbstracts in Cervical Cancer 11/13/2008 - (DGNews)
    CDC Releases First Estimate of HPV-Associated Cancer Data - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Cervical Cancer 10/30/2008 - (DGNews)
    New MRI Technique May Identify Cervical Cancer Early - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Cervical Cancer 10/16/2008 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Cervical Cancer
      HPV Vaccine: Perspectives and Recommendations
      Controversies in HPV Vaccination
      Vaccinating Against the Human Papillomavirus in Young Women

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Cervical Cancer
        Conservatively Treated Glassy Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix
        Cervical Lymphadenopathy - An Unusual Presentation of Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Case Report
        A Rare Case of Primary Mesenteric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Metastasis to the Cervix Uteri
        Metastatic Tumor of Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Uterine Cervix to Heart: Ante-Mortem Diagnosis
        Cerebral Metastasis of Cervical Uterine Cancer: Report of Three Cases

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > cervical cancer > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague

        DGNews


        Cervical Cancer Vaccine May Lose Effectiveness During Ovulation

        WASHINGTON, DC -- August 6, 2003 -- A new study has found that a vaccine against human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16), the virus that causes cervical cancer, produces antibodies against HPV16 at the site where cervical cancer develops--a promising indication of the vaccine's effectiveness. However, antibody levels appear to decrease around ovulation, raising the possibility that the vaccine may be less effective during that time. The findings appear in the August 6 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

        A vaccine is considered promising if it can produce an immune response (determined by levels of antibodies) at disease-specific sites such as the cervix. Past studies have shown that an HPV16 vaccine can trigger an immune response and protect against HPV16 infection. However, most of these studies involved women who were taking oral contraceptives (which regulate menstruation), and it is unclear what effect changes in hormone levels during the natural menstrual cycle would have on the vaccine's effectiveness.

        To examine the influence of menstrual cycle stage and oral contraceptive use on antibody levels, Denise Nardelli-Haefliger, Ph.D., of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois in Lausanne, Switzerland, and Douglas R. Lowy, M.D., of the National Cancer Institute, and their colleagues administered the HPV 16 vaccine to seven women who were taking oral contraceptives and 11 women who were ovulating. The researchers collected blood and cervical secretions twice a week for 5 weeks and determined concentrations of anti-HPV16 antibodies during different phases of the menstrual cycle.

        All of the women had relatively high levels of antibodies in their cervical secretions after immunization. Among women taking oral contraceptives, antibody levels remained relatively constant throughout the menstrual cycle. In contrast, levels of vaccine-specific and total antibodies in ovulating women were highest during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle and lowest around ovulation, suggesting that sex hormones may play a role in regulating antibody concentration at the cervix.

        Given these findings, the authors say that it will be important to determine whether the vaccine will be as effective at protecting ovulating women from HPV16 infections as it appears to be for women taking oral contraceptives.

        They suggest that the decrease in antibody levels during ovulation might be a mechanism to protect sperm from antibodies. It remains unclear whether such a decrease in antibodies translates into a decrease in vaccine effectiveness.


        SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute



        E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2008 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send