Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Bacterial Infections
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Bacterial Infections
    Predicting Tuberculosis Outbreaks Based on the First 2 Cases - (DGNews)
    New Rapid Tests for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis for Developing Countries - (DGNews)
    Bone Infections and Complications More Severe in Children With MRSA - (DGNews)
    Ceftobiprole Approved in Canada for Treatment of Complicated Skin Infections - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Bacterial Infections 06/23/2008 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Bacterial Infections
      The Use of Saline Nasal Irrigation in Common Upper Respiratory Conditions
      The Continuing Emergence of MRSA
      Complications of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea
      Antimicrobial Resistance Among Community Pathogens
      Evaluation and Management of Pneumonia in Older Adults

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Bacterial Infections
        Successful Treatment of Perineal Necrotising Fasciitis and Associated Pubic Bone Osteomyelitis with the Vacuum Assisted Closure System
        Ludwig's Angina and Airway Considerations: A Case Report
        Coexistence of Primary Adenocarcinoma of the Lung and Tsukamurella Pneumonia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
        Pericardial Effusion as the Only Manifestation of Infection with Francisella tularensis: A Case Report
        Gluteal Pyomyositis as a Rare Cause of Sciatica in a Temperate Region: A Case Report

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > bacterial infections > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Voriconazole Clears Aspergillosis Infections With Less Overall Expense than Amphotericin: Presented at ICAAC

        By Ed Susman

        CHICAGO, IL -- September 24, 2003 -- Researchers found that treating patients with a new antifungal agent -- voriconazole -- results in lower overall cost than treatment with amphotericin B, even though the new drug is more expensive.

        In a presentation here September 18th at the 43rd Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Thomas Patterson, MD, Professor of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, noted that use of voriconazole also appears to be more effective than the standard treatment of invasive aspergillosis.

        "For patients whose immune systems are compromised by cancer chemotherapy or organ and bone-marrow transplants, invasive aspergillosis can be fatal," said Dr. Patterson. "Physicians need to understand that the type of therapy selected for first line [treatment] impacts the patient's chance of survival."

        Dr. Patterson said that after 12 weeks, total costs for 144 patients randomized to voriconazole were $783,184 U.S. ($581,008 for the drug itself and $202,176 for other licensed anti-fungal therapy). The 133 patients who were first assigned to receive amphotericin B had a total drug cost of $826,005 ($31,677 U.S. for the drug and $794,328 for other licensed anti-fungal therapy).

        "Overall per patient cost was $772 less for those randomized to primary therapy with voriconazole than for those randomized to initial therapy with amphotericin B," Dr. Patterson reported.

        In addition, he noted, initial treatment with voriconazole led to significantly better outcomes for patients compared with those initially treated with amphotericin B. The voriconazole patients achieved a 53% success rate, compared with a 32% with amphotericin B

        Further, 36% of voriconazole patients required other anti-fungal treatment compared with 80% of patients treated with amphotericin B, Dr. Patterson noted.

        "The cost of antifungal therapy must include both the total drug costs as well as the potential for a positive outcome," said co-author James Lewis, PharmD, infectious diseases pharmacy specialist, University of Texas Health Science Center. "The reduced drug cost seen in the study is influenced by the improved efficacy and tolerability of voriconazole when compared to other therapies."

        Total drug cost per positive outcome (treatment success) was $10,305 for voriconazole and $19,667 for amphotericin B.

        This study was supported by Pfizer, Inc.


        [Study title: Economic Advantage of Voriconazole (VRC) for Primary Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis Compared to Conventional Amphotericin B (CAB). Abstract A-1359]



        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2008 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send