Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Hypertension
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Hypertension
    Valsartan Better Than Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Previously Untreated Hypertensive Sleep Apnoea: Presented at CHEST 2009 - (DGDispatch)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 11/04/2009 - (DGNews)
    Paricalcitol Added to Hypertension Therapy Lowers Albuminuria in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Presented at Renal Week 2009 - (DGDispatch)
    Hypertension, Markers of Inflammation In the Blood More Common in Offspring of Parents With AD - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 10/29/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Hypertension
    • State of the Art in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    • Optimizing Antihypertensive Therapy and Health and Economic Outcomes in a Managed Care Environment
      Treating Coronary Artery Disease in Vulnerable Adults
      Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: The Masquerader
      Innovative Strategies in Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Hypertension
        Hypertension
        Medical Management of a Pregnancy Woman with Moderate Renal Insufficiency and Superimposed Preclampsia
        Malignant Hypertension and Acute Aortic Dissection Associated with Caffeine-Based Ephedra-Free Dietary Supplements: A Case Report
        Giant Right Coronary Artery Aneurysm: Case Report and Literature Review
        Normalization of Systemic Arterial Hypertension Following Removal of Posterior Fossa Hemangioblastoma: A Case Report

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > hypertension > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

        DGReview


        Irbesartan More Effective Than Amlodipine in Reducing Left Ventricular Mass Index

        A DGReview of :"Comparative effects of irbesartan versus amlodipine on left ventricular mass index in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy"
        Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology

        11/04/2003
        By Emma Hitt, PhD


        Irbesartan appears to be more effective than amlodipine in reducing left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) despite a similar effect on blood pressure (BP), new research suggests.

        Several studies have established that LVH is a powerful BP-independent cardiovascular risk factor; however, not all antihypertensive drugs can reverse LVH.

        Carlo Gaudio, MD, with the University of Rome, Italy, and colleagues assessed the effects of irbesartan and amlodipine on LVMI in patients with mild to moderate untreated hypertension and echocardiographically determined LVH.

        Sixty hypertensive patients (35 men, 25 women; mean age, 52.8 years ± 12.6) with diastolic BP >/= 100 mm Hg were randomised to receive irbesartan 150 mg once daily or amlodipine 5 mg once daily for a 4-week titration period.

        Dosage was increased to irbesartan 300 mg once daily or amlodipine 10 mg once daily in the event that sitting diastolic BP remained > 90 mmHg after 2 weeks. More than half of the patients in both groups required dosage doubling.

        After the titration period, only the responders (sitting diastolic BP </= 90 mmHg) entered a 5-month maintenance period. After 3 months, echocardiographically estimated LVMI decreased by 23.2% in the irbesartan-treated patients and 11.4% in the amlodipine-treated patients. Adjusted mean difference was 11.8% in favour of irbesartan (P < .0001).

        After 6 months, the LVMI decreased by 24.7% in the irbesartan-treated patients and 13.0% in the amlodipine-treated patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 11.6% in favour of irbesartan (P < .0001).

        "Our findings are consistent with the main conclusions of several recent studies that assessed the efficacy of the angiotensin receptor antagonists on BP reduction and LVMI regression," the researchers conclude.

        According to the researchers, the results suggest that irbesartan, and possibly other angiotensin receptor antagonists could play an important role in preventing cardiovascular complications and causing regression of target organ damage.



        J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2003;42:5:622-628. "Comparative effects of irbesartan versus amlodipine on left ventricular mass index in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy"

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send