Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Breast Cancer
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Breast Cancer
    Type of Breast Reconstruction Impacts Radiation Therapy Outcomes - (DGNews)
    Study Identifies Causes of Bone Loss in Breast Cancer Survivors - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Breast Cancer 11/18/2008 - (DGNews)
    Psychological Interventions Associated With Breast Cancer Survival - (DGNews)
    Aromatase Inhibitors, Androgen Deprivation Increase Risk of Bone Loss - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Breast Cancer

    Webcasts/CME archive

     Recent cases - Breast Cancer
      Presentation and Course of Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer in a Paranoid-Schizophrenic Patient: A Case Report
      Granular Cell Tumour of the Pectoral Muscle Mimicking Breast Cancer
      Primary Osteosarcoma of the Breast: Case Report
      A Case of Matrix-Producing Carcinoma of the Breast
      Metastatic Hurthle Cell Carcinoma of the Thyroid Presenting as a Breast Lump: A Case Report

      Cases archive
        




      my personal edition > breast cancer > news
      divider

        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

      DGDispatch


      Women with Node-Positive, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer Do Not Benefit From Doxorubicin: Presented at CFS

      By Charlene Laino

      NEW YORK, NY -- November 19, 2003 -- Adding doxorubicin to the regimen of patients with node-positive, hormone-receptor negative breast cancer does not improve survival, according to results of the Southwest Oncology Group Trial 8313.

      Saul Rivkin, MD, a medical oncologist at the Swedish Cancer Institute in Seattle, Washington, United States, presented the findings here on November 13th at Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium XXI.

      Between May 1984 and June 1990, 531 patients were entered into the study, a randomized trial designed to compare a short-course of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and methotrexate versus a longer course of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine and prednisone for node-positive, hormone-receptor negative breast cancer.

      The women were randomised to the CMFVP arm, which consisted of 1 year of therapy with daily oral cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/day, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 IV weekly, intravenous (IV) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 weekly, vincristine 0.625 mg/m2 IV weekly for 10 weeks, and oral prednisone at an initial dose of 30 mg/m2 tapering to zero over 10 weeks, or to the FAC-M arm, which consisted of 20 weeks of therapy with four 5-week cycles of 5FU 500 mg/m2 IV, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV all on day 1, and methotrexate 50 mg/m2 IV on day 22.

      At 10 years, 53% of women in the CMFVP arm were alive, compared to 47% of those in the FAC-M arm, a non-significant difference, Dr. Rivkin reported.

      When looked at by subgroup, there was still no evidence of a survival advantage associated with the short-course CMFVP, he said. Among women with one to three positive nodes, 68% versus 65% were alive in the CMFVP and FAC-M groups, respectively. Among women with four or more positive nodes, 39% and 30% were alive, respectively.

      "The findings show [doxorubicin] in this cohort of patients did not add to survival," he said.


      [Study title: 20-Year Follow-up of the Early Southwest Oncology Group Adjuvant Breast Studies. Abstract 42]



      E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






      All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2008 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



      The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
         Feedback
      Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
      Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      Send