Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Clinical Pharmacology
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Clinical Pharmacology
    The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - (BMJ)
    Recurrence up to 3.5 years after antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media in very young Dutch children: survey of trial participants - (BMJ)
    Topical Cream Effective Against Cetuximab-Induced Acne-Like Rash: Presented at ESMO-GI - (DGDispatch)
    Endocrine Society Responds to Insulin Glargine Studies With Recommendations - (DGNews)
    Two Bevacizumab-Based Combination Regimens Equally Effective in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Presented at ESMO-GI - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Clinical Pharmacology
    • Biologics in Crohn's Disease: Treating Early, Treating Long-Term
    • Urinalysis: A Guide for Pharmacists
      Clinical Management of Nutrition in Hospitalized Patients: Improving Safety and Patient Outcomes
      Advances in the Management of Postoperative Ileus: Reducing the Clinical and Economic Burden
      The Challenge of Type 2 Diabetes: Emerging Options for Improving Glycemic Control

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Clinical Pharmacology
        Bilateral Swollen Eyelids Occurring During Adjuvant Treatment with Tamoxifen for Early Breast Cancer
        Acute Abdominal Pain in a Patient Receiving Enoxaparin
        Fatal Pneumonitis After Treatment with Docetaxel and Trastuzumab
        Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Disulfiram
        Clopidogrel Resistance "Live" - The Risk of Stent Thrombosis Should Be Evaluated Before Procedures

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > clinical pharmacology > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

        DGReview


        Patients Prefer Disposable Insulin-Injection Pen to Conventional Vial/Syringe Delivery Method

        A DGReview of :"A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus"
        Clinical Therapeutics

        01/16/2004
        By Keely S. Solomon, Ph.D.


        Prefilled, disposable pens are comparable to the traditional vial/syringe insulin delivery method in efficacy and safety, but patients with diabetes prefer the pen overall, according to a study from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, United States.

        "Prefilled, disposable insulin-injection devices may have the notable advantage of simplicity, with minimal training and attention required," writes Mary Korytkowski, MD.

        Dr. Korytkowski and colleagues performed an open-label, 2-period crossover trial to compare patient preference, efficacy and safety of the prefilled, disposable pen with the conventional vial/syringe insulin delivery method. The study included 121 patients (mean age, 57±12.4 years; 62 males) 14 with type 1 and 107 with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

        All patients were syringe/vial users and had never used another method of insulin delivery. After a 4-week run in period, patients were randomly assigned to use either a prefilled, disposable pen device or the vial/syringe method to administer a mixture of 70% insulin aspart protamine suspension and 30% insulin aspart for 4 weeks (NovoLog Mix 70/30). Patients were then switched to the opposite delivery method for the following 4 weeks.

        Seventy-four percent of the 103 patients who completed the trial found using the pen device to be easier overall, as determined by a patient preference questionnaire given at the end of the study. Specifically, 85% found the insulin dose scale easier to read, 73% felt more confident in the accuracy of the insulin dose delivered, and 85% felt that the pen was more discreet to use in a public place.

        The researchers found a statistically significant improvement in glycaemic control during the entire study, with a 0.3% average reduction in glycosylated haemoglobin values (P < .05). No differences in glycaemic control were detected between the two devices, and safety profiles were also found to be comparable.

        "This study provides additional evidence that an alternative injection device technology may meet with more positive patient feelings than the vial/syringe method, even among patients who were already generally satisfied using the latter," the researchers conclude.

        Clin Ther 2003 Nov;25:11:2836-48. "A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus"

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send