my personal edition > bacterial infections > news


  E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague

DGNews

New Analysis Supports Starting with VFEND (Voriconazole) For Life-Threatening Fungal Infections

NEW YORK, NY -- October 26, 2005 -- A new analysis of treatment procedures for the potentially deadly fungal infection invasive aspergillosis suggests that making the right treatment decision as soon as possible after diagnosis may be crucial to survival.

The retrospective analysis, published in the Nov. 15 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, showed that patients who initially received Pfizer's antifungal agent VFEND(R) (voriconazole) were more likely to survive than patients who initially received amphotericin B deoxycholate.

The analysis also showed that patients who started on VFEND were less likely to need salvage therapy than those on amphotericin B. Salvage therapy is treatment given after the infection has not responded to the initial treatment or if the patient cannot tolerate the initial medicine.

Invasive aspergillosis is a severe pulmonary infection that can occur in patients with weakened immune systems. The fatality rate for invasive aspergillosis is estimated to be 58%, but approaches 90 to 100% in patients whose infection has spread beyond the primary site.

"These high mortality rates for invasive aspergillosis underscore the importance of initial treatment for this often fatal infection," said Dr. Thomas F. Patterson, lead author of the analysis and professor of medicine at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. "Our analysis demonstrates that voriconazole's efficacy and tolerability make it an important choice for first-line therapy."

About The Study
The Global Comparative Aspergillosis Study (GCAS) led to VFEND's 2002 approval for the first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis and was the basis for this newly published analysis. In that study, 144 patients with confirmed or probable invasive aspergillosis were started on VFEND and 133 were started on amphotericin B. If the disease progressed or the patient was unable to tolerate initial therapy, treatment could be changed to salvage therapy, which was referred to in the trial as "other licensed antifungal therapy," or OLAT.

Treatment was considered successful if the infection improved or was cured after 12 weeks of total therapy. Therapies that were used as salvage therapy included lipid formulations of amphotericin B, itraconazole, a dose reduction in amphotericin B, and other systemic antifungal therapy.

Results of the Analysis
Patterson et al retrospectively analyzed the data from the GCAS to assess the effect of salvage therapy on patient outcomes. Their analysis showed that just over a third (36%) of patients in the VFEND group required subsequent salvage therapy, while more than three-quarters (80%) of patients in the amphotericin B group required salvage therapy.

In addition, it found that of those patients in either group who had to switch to salvage therapy, patients who started on VFEND had better outcomes:

· Patients in the VFEND group, who were switched to OLAT, were more likely to survive than those in the amphotericin B group who took OLAT (48% versus 38%, respectively). (Overall survival in the GCAS was 71% in the Vfend group versus 58% in the amphotericin B group.)

· Of patients who had to switch to OLAT due to drug intolerance, those treated initially with VFEND had a higher success rate than those in the amphotericin B group (50% versus 38%, respectively)

· Of those who had to switch to OLAT due to their initial treatment not working for them, patients initially treated with VFEND had a higher success rate than those treated with amphotericin B group (26% versus 19%, respectively)

In addition, 55% of patients treated with VFEND alone had a successful outcome, compared to four% of those on amphotericin B alone. (The overall efficacy rate was 53% for patients initially treated with VFEND, versus 32% for patients initially treated with amphotericin B, regardless of whether OLAT was used.)

It should be noted that lipid formulations of amphotericin B are often used due to their perceived reduction in toxicity. In the GCAS, the lipid formulations were the most commonly used OLAT (38% of patients who received OLAT). However, the subsequent analysis of that study demonstrated that this salvage therapy was effective in only 30% of patients in the amphotericin B group and 36% of patients in the VFEND group. This success rate decreased to 12% when lipid formulations of amphotericin B were used in patients following an initial insufficient clinical response to amphotericin B deoxycholate.

"Our analysis concluded that in order to reduce mortality rates associated with invasive aspergillosis, we need to rethink the practice of relying on salvage therapy, including lipid formulations of amphotericin B, and focus more on making the right initial treatment decision," said Dr. Patterson.

About VFEND
VFEND was discovered by Pfizer researchers and was developed to address the unmet medical need for more effective and better-tolerated options for patients at risk for serious fungal infections.

VFEND is currently approved in the United States for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, esophageal candidiasis, candidemia in nonneutropenic patients (those without low white blood cell counts) and certain Candida infections (disseminated infections in skin and infections in abdomen, kidney, bladder wall and wounds). VFEND is also approved as salvage therapy for fungal infections caused by pathogens Scedosporium apiospermum and Fusarium species.

VFEND is the only IV/oral antifungal specifically indicated for the first-line treatment of mould and yeast infections. The ability to switch patients from IV to oral VFEND allows patients to remain on the same medication throughout the course of treatment, both on an inpatient and outpatient basis.

Most frequently reported adverse events (all causalities) in therapeutic trials were visual disturbances, fever, rash, vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, headache, sepsis, peripheral edema, abdominal pain and respiratory disorder. Treatment-related adverse events that most often led to discontinuation in clinical trials were elevated liver function tests (LFTs), rash and visual disturbances. VFEND treatment-related visual disturbances are common. The effect of VFEND on visual function is not known if treatment continues beyond 28 days.

VFEND is contraindicated with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, pimozide, quinidine (since increased plasma concentrations for these drugs can lead to QT prolongation and rare occurrences of torsades de pointes), sirolimus, rifampin, rifabutin, carbamazepine, long-acting barbiturates, ergot alkaloids, efavirenz and ritonavir (400 mg q12h). There have been uncommon cases of serious hepatic reactions during treatment with VFEND (clinical hepatitis, cholestasis and fulminant hepatic failure, including fatalities). LFTs should be evaluated at the start of and during the course of therapy. Patients have rarely developed serious cutaneous reactions, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, during treatment with VFEND.


SOURCE: Edelman Public Relations

E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague

To print, use this version