Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Hypertension
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Hypertension
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 07/01/2009 - (DGNews)
    Certain Biomarkers Have Limitations in Predicting Cardiovascular Events - (DGNews)
    Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: prospective cohort study - (BMJ)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 06/24/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 06/17/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Hypertension
    Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: The Masquerader
    Innovative Strategies in Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction
    Diuretics for the Treatment of Hypertension
    Managing Hypertension: Addressing the Challenges in Special Populations

    Webcasts/CME archive

     Recent cases - Hypertension
      Medical Management of a Pregnancy Woman with Moderate Renal Insufficiency and Superimposed Preclampsia
      Malignant Hypertension and Acute Aortic Dissection Associated with Caffeine-Based Ephedra-Free Dietary Supplements: A Case Report
      Giant Right Coronary Artery Aneurysm: Case Report and Literature Review
      Normalization of Systemic Arterial Hypertension Following Removal of Posterior Fossa Hemangioblastoma: A Case Report
      Headache and Seizure on Postpartum Day 5: Late Postpartum Eclampsia

      Cases archive
        




      my personal edition > hypertension > news
      divider

        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

      DGDispatch


      Reduced Diabetes Likelihood in Hypertensives Starting Valsartan Treatment: Presented at ASH

      By Jill Stein

      NEW YORK, N.Y. -- May 18, 2006 -- The risk of new-onset diabetes is lower among hypertensive patients initiating therapy with valsartan than those who initiate with amlodipine, according to data presented here at the 21st Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Society of Hypertension (ASH).

      Derek Weycker, PhD, senior consultant, Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, Massachusetts, and colleagues compared the risk of new-onset diabetes among 28,697 hypertensive patients who were at least 35 years of age and free of diabetes who initiated therapy with valsartan or amlodipine in a real-world setting.

      "Recent evidence suggests that the risk of diabetes among patients with hypertension may differ based on antihypertensive therapy received," Dr. Weycker said on May 17th.

      The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial was the first large, randomized trial to compare diabetes risk between patients receiving an angiotensin-receptor blocker versus a calcium antagonist. Over a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, the risk of diabetes was 11.5% for valsartan versus 14.5% for amlodipine; the odds ratio was 0.77 in favor of valsartan.

      Whether or not this finding holds true in the real-world setting has not been determined, Dr. Wycker said.

      The present investigation used information from an integrated database of medical and outpatient pharmacy claims from 49 U.S. health plans with 15 million covered lives annually. The data spanned the period January 1998 through March 2005.

      New-onset diabetes was identified based on at least 2 outpatient diagnoses at least 7 days apart, at least 1 inpatient diagnosis, or at least 1 prescription for an anti-diabetic medication.

      Over a mean follow-up of 407 days, 2.4% of valsartan patients developed diabetes; the corresponding figure for amlodipine was 3.3% over a mean follow-up of 460 days.

      At the end of 1 year, the unadjusted risk of diabetes was 2.4% for valsartan versus 2.9% for amlodipine; at the end of 3 years, corresponding risks were 5.6% and 6.8%.

      In Cox proportional hazards regression, the relative risk of diabetes for patients receiving valsartan versus amlodipine was.0.79.

      Dr. Weycker said that any interpretation of the results needs to consider the fact that the study was based on healthcare claims data. Limitations include coding errors and missing information on clinically important parameters such as blood pressure, blood glucose, body weight that may affect the risk of diabetes.

      He added that the biological basis for this difference in diabetes risk has not yet been well characterized.

      The study was sponsored by Novartis Pharma AG in Basel, Switzerland.


      [Presentation title: Risk of Diabetes in Hypertensive Patients Receiving Amlodipine Versus Valsartan. Abstract P-229]



      E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






      All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



      The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
         Feedback
      Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
      Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      Send