Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Hypertension
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Hypertension
    Obesity Leading Risk Factor of Left Atrial Enlargement During Aging - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 11/25/2009 - (DGNews)
    Team-Based Care Involving a Pharmacist Improves Blood Pressure Control - (DGNews)
    Pre-eclampsia, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1, and the risk of reduced thyroid function: nested case-control and population based study - (BMJ)
    TopAbstracts in Hypertension 11/18/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Hypertension
    • State of the Art in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    • Medication Use for Diabetes, Hypertension, and Hypercholesterolemia from 1988-1994 to 2001-2006
      Optimizing Antihypertensive Therapy and Health and Economic Outcomes in a Managed Care Environment
      Treating Coronary Artery Disease in Vulnerable Adults
      Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: The Masquerader

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Hypertension
        A Woman with Swollen Fingers and New-Onset Hypertension and Renal Failure
        Hypertension
        Medical Management of a Pregnancy Woman with Moderate Renal Insufficiency and Superimposed Preclampsia
        Malignant Hypertension and Acute Aortic Dissection Associated with Caffeine-Based Ephedra-Free Dietary Supplements: A Case Report
        Giant Right Coronary Artery Aneurysm: Case Report and Literature Review

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > hypertension > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Reduced Diabetes Likelihood in Hypertensives Starting Valsartan Treatment: Presented at ASH

        By Jill Stein

        NEW YORK, N.Y. -- May 18, 2006 -- The risk of new-onset diabetes is lower among hypertensive patients initiating therapy with valsartan than those who initiate with amlodipine, according to data presented here at the 21st Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Society of Hypertension (ASH).

        Derek Weycker, PhD, senior consultant, Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, Massachusetts, and colleagues compared the risk of new-onset diabetes among 28,697 hypertensive patients who were at least 35 years of age and free of diabetes who initiated therapy with valsartan or amlodipine in a real-world setting.

        "Recent evidence suggests that the risk of diabetes among patients with hypertension may differ based on antihypertensive therapy received," Dr. Weycker said on May 17th.

        The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial was the first large, randomized trial to compare diabetes risk between patients receiving an angiotensin-receptor blocker versus a calcium antagonist. Over a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, the risk of diabetes was 11.5% for valsartan versus 14.5% for amlodipine; the odds ratio was 0.77 in favor of valsartan.

        Whether or not this finding holds true in the real-world setting has not been determined, Dr. Wycker said.

        The present investigation used information from an integrated database of medical and outpatient pharmacy claims from 49 U.S. health plans with 15 million covered lives annually. The data spanned the period January 1998 through March 2005.

        New-onset diabetes was identified based on at least 2 outpatient diagnoses at least 7 days apart, at least 1 inpatient diagnosis, or at least 1 prescription for an anti-diabetic medication.

        Over a mean follow-up of 407 days, 2.4% of valsartan patients developed diabetes; the corresponding figure for amlodipine was 3.3% over a mean follow-up of 460 days.

        At the end of 1 year, the unadjusted risk of diabetes was 2.4% for valsartan versus 2.9% for amlodipine; at the end of 3 years, corresponding risks were 5.6% and 6.8%.

        In Cox proportional hazards regression, the relative risk of diabetes for patients receiving valsartan versus amlodipine was.0.79.

        Dr. Weycker said that any interpretation of the results needs to consider the fact that the study was based on healthcare claims data. Limitations include coding errors and missing information on clinically important parameters such as blood pressure, blood glucose, body weight that may affect the risk of diabetes.

        He added that the biological basis for this difference in diabetes risk has not yet been well characterized.

        The study was sponsored by Novartis Pharma AG in Basel, Switzerland.


        [Presentation title: Risk of Diabetes in Hypertensive Patients Receiving Amlodipine Versus Valsartan. Abstract P-229]



        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send