Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Contraception
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Contraception
    Oral Contraceptives May Benefit Women With Asthma - (DGNews)
    Migraine and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis - (BMJ)
    TopAbstracts in Contraception 10/20/2009 - (DGNews)
    FDA Approves Levonorgestrel IUD to Treat Heavy Menstrual Bleeding - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Contraception 09/22/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Contraception
      Pregnancy Planning and Preconception Health Care for HIV-Infected Individuals and Couples
      Improving Contraceptive Success: Facilitating Choice of Appropriate and Acceptable Contraceptive Methods
      Sterilization Methods for Women
      Gynecologic and Colorectal Cancer: Risks and Benefits of Contraceptive Methods
      Injectable Contraceptives

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Contraception
        Spontaneous Perforated Pyometra with an Intrauterine Device in Menopause: a Case Report
        Foreign Body Granuloma in the Anterior Abdominal Wall Mimicking an Acute Appendicular Lump and Induced by a Translocated Copper-T Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Case Report
        Co-Existence of a Giant Splenic Hemangioma and Multiple Hepatic Hemangiomas and the Potential Association With the Use of Oral Contraceptives: A Case Report
        Pelvic Actinomycosis Presenting with a Large Abscess and Bowel Stenosis with Marked Response to Conservative Treatment: A Case Report
        The Sexually Active Adolescent Who is Uncertain about Using Contraception

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > contraception > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        No Excess in Venous Thromboembolism Seen With Ethinyl Oestradiol/Drospirenone Oral Contraceptive: Presented at ACOG

          By Ed Susman

          SAN DIEGO, CA -- May 9, 2007 -- The ethinyl oestradiol/drospirenone oral contraceptive does not appear to show any signal of causing excess venous thromboemboli, researchers said here at the 55th annual clinical meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).

          Because the relatively rare risk of venous thromboemboli is not often seen in clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance is required to determine if there is a clotting problem associated with new medications, said John D. Seeger, PharmD, DrPH, senior scientist, i3 Drug Safety, Ingenix, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States.

          In the study, Dr. Seeger and colleagues scrutinised the incidence rate of venous thromboembolism for Yasmin using data culled from the Ingenix Research Data Mart for between July 2001 and June 2004. That data were compared with the incidence rate of venous thromboemboli among other initiators of oral contraceptives.

          "We found that women initiating ethinyl oestradiol/ drospirenone are no more likely than other oral contraceptive initiators to experience the event of venous thromboembolism," Dr. Seeger said.

          The researchers matched 22,429 ethinyl oestradiol/drospirenone oral contraceptive initiators with 44,858 other oral contraceptive users. The study included women who were 10 to 59 years of age at the time of initiating the use of contraceptives.

          Among the ethinyl oestradiol/drospirenone oral contraceptive used there were 14,541woman-years of use and 18 venous thromboembolism events -- a rate of 1.2 per 1,000 women-years.

          Among the other oral contraceptive used, there were 28,169 woman-years of use and 39 venous thromboembolism events -- a rate of 1.4 per 1,000 women-years.

          The relative-risk ratio of 0.9 indicates no significant difference in outcomes between ethinyl oestradiol/drospirenone initiators and other oral contraceptive initiators.

          "Risk factors -- including thromboembolism risk factors -- were well balanced between ethinyl oestradiol/drospirenone initiators and other oral contraceptive initiators, but absolute incidence rates reflect the fact that women were not excluded for having risk factors," Dr. Seeger said.

          The study was supported by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, New Jersey, United States.


          [Presentation title: Venous Thromboembolism Among Women Using Ethinyl Estradiol With Drospirenone and Other Oral Contraceptives. Abstract 8 (May 8)]




        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send