Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
AIDS and HIV
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - AIDS and HIV
    TopAbstracts in AIDS and HIV 11/23/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in AIDS and HIV 11/09/2009 - (DGNews)
    Use of Lymphosum Tube to Double-Check Low CD4 Counts Is Unnecessary: Presented at ASCP - (DGDispatch)
    Neurocognitive Issues Plague HIV-Infected Patients Taking Antiretroviral Therapy: Presented at IDSA - (DGDispatch)
    Antiretroviral-Experienced Patients Maintain HIV Suppression Through 144 Weeks: Presented at IDSA - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - AIDS and HIV
      Prevention With Positives In HIV Medical Care
      Non-AIDS-Defining Cancers in Patients with HIV Infection
      Management of an HIV-Infected Patient After Initial Antiretroviral Regimen Failure
      The Use of Chemokine Receptor Antagonists in Antiretroviral Treatment Failure
      Issues in the Care of HIV and Hepatitis C Virus-coinfected Patients: Antiretroviral Pharmacokinetics, Drug Interactions, and Liver Transplantation

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - AIDS and HIV
        A Patient with Neck Pain and Fever
        Rapid and Persistent Selection of the K103N Mutation as a Majority Quasispecies in a HIV1-Patient Exposed to Efavirenz for Three Weeks: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
        Newly Formed Cystic Lesions for the Development of Pneumomediastinum in Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia
        Bordetella Bronchiseptica Pneumonia in a Man with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: A Case Report
        HIV Care for the Primary Care Physician

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > aids and hiv > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Integrase Inhibitor Raltegravir as Effective as Efavirenz-Based Therapy in Naive HIV-Infected Patients: Presented at IAS

          By Ed Susman

          SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA -- July 25, 2007 - Close to 90% of patients treated with either the novel integrase inhibitor raltegravir or the standard-of-care non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase efavirenz were able to suppress HIV to undetectable levels, researchers said here at the 4th International AIDS Society (IAS) Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention.

          However, Martin Markowitz, MD, Clinical Director, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York, New York, said that treatment with raltegravir -- which is still awaiting approval by the US Food and Drug Administration -- caused fewer adverse effects in the patients during the 48-week trial.

          Dr. Markowitz and colleagues enrolled 198 treatment-naive patients and randomized them to one of four doses of raltegravir -- 100, 200, 400, and 600 mg twice a day -- or to 600 mg a day of efavirenz. Both treatments were administered with tenofovir and lamivudine.

          Regardless of the study dose, it took about 4 weeks for about 90% of patients to reach a viral load of less than 400 copies of HIV RNA per milliliter of blood, he said. In contrast, patients on efavirenz took between 8 and 12 weeks to reach the same level.

          "The FDA application for raltegravir is for its use in patients who have had previous antiretroviral treatments but have not been able to suppress viral levels to undetectable," Dr. Markowitz said. "The studies we presented here in Sydney are exploring the possibility of using the drug early in treatment."

          In the study, Dr. Markowitz noted, there was no difference in the proportions of patients who reached low levels of HIV by the end of the study. Also, the proportion of patients who experienced treatment failure -- defined as nonresponse or a rebound in viral load -- was 3% for both raltegravir and efavirenz.

          The major difference between the drugs, he said, was in the side effects, with raltegravir being "more benign." There were no dose-related toxicities.

          The most common side effects were the known central nervous system events of efavirenz -- abnormal dreams, dizziness, and headache -- and those were higher in the efavirenz arm.

          Raltegravir also appears to be neutral with respect to changes in lipids, Dr. Markowitz said.

          The study was sponsored by Merck, which is developing raltegravir. Merck has filed for approval of raltegravir with the FDA. A hearing is scheduled for September 5, 2007.


          [Presentation title: Rapid Onset and Durable Antiretroviral Effect of Raltegravir (MK-0518), a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, as Part of Combination ART in Treatment-Naive HIV-1 Infected Patients: 48-Week Data. Abstract TUAB104]




        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send