Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
STDs
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - STDs
    TopAbstracts in STDs 06/29/2009 - (DGNews)
    Use of Assay Can Detect Lower Genital Tract Infections in Patients With Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Presented at ICC - (DGDispatch)
    TopAbstracts in STDs 06/01/2009 - (DGNews)
    HPV Vaccine Effective in Women Aged 24 to 45 Years Not Already Infected With the Virus - (DGNews)
    Tumour HPV Status Predicts Survival in Patients With Oropharynx Cancers: Presented at ASCO - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - STDs

    Webcasts/CME archive

     Recent cases - STDs
      The Rash of Secondary Syphilis
      Syphilis Presenting as Erosive Papules on the Palate
      An Unusual Cause of an Epidural Abscess
      A Diagnosis Unmasked by an Unusual Reaction to Ceftriaxone Therapy for Gonorrhoeal Infection

      Cases archive
        




      my personal edition > stds > news
      divider

        E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague

      DGNews


      Screening for Chlamydial Infection: Recommendation Statement

        August 17, 2007 -- The following is the recommendation statement for screening for chlamydial infection from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

        This release updates a previously published guideline published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine in April 2001.

        MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS
        The US Preventive Services Task Force grades its recommendations (A, B, C, D, or I) and identifies the Levels of Certainty regarding Net Benefit (High, Moderate, and Low). The definitions of these grades can be found at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

        Summary of the Recommendations

        · The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for chlamydial infection for all sexually active non-pregnant young women aged 24 and younger, and for older non-pregnant women who are at increased risk. A recommendation
        · The USPSTF recommends screening for chlamydial infection for all pregnant women aged 24 and younger, and for older pregnant women who are at increased risk. B recommendation
        · The USPSTF recommends against routinely providing screening for chlamydial infection for women aged 25 and older, whether or not they are pregnant, if they are not at increased risk. C recommendation
        · The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for chlamydial infection for men. I statement.

        See "Assessment of Risk" and "Suggestions for Practice Regarding an I Statement" below for discussions of assessing risk for chlamydial infection in women and suggestions for practice regarding screening for men.

        Clinical Considerations
        Patient Population Under Consideration

        These recommendations target all sexually active individuals, including adolescents and pregnant women.

        Assessment of Risk
        All sexually active women 24 years and younger—including adolescents—are at increased risk for chlamydial infection. In addition to sexual activity and age, other risk factors for chlamydial infection include a history of previous chlamydial or other sexually transmitted infection, new or multiple sexual partners, inconsistent condom use, and exchanging sex for money or drugs. Risk factors for pregnant women are the same as for non-pregnant women. Prevalence of chlamydial infection varies widely among patient populations. African American and Hispanic women have a higher prevalence of infection than the general population in many communities and settings. Among men and women, increased prevalence rates are also found in incarcerated populations, military recruits, and patients at public sexually transmitted infection clinics.

        Screening Tests
        Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have high specificity and sensitivity when used as screening tests for chlamydial infection. NAATs can be used with urine and vaginal swabs, enabling screening when a pelvic examination is not performed.

        Treatment
        Appropriate treatment of chlamydia infection has been outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) see the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) summary of the CDC guideline Clinical prevention guidance. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2006.

        In its 2006 sexually transmitted disease (STD) treatment guidelines, the CDC recommends that chlamydia infection be treated with a single oral dose of 1 g of azithromycin or seven days of twice daily oral doxycline (100 mg). Pregnant women with chlamydial infection may be treated with a single dose of one gram of Azithromycin or Amoxicillin 500 mg orally three times daily for 7 days. Since the CDC updates these recommendations regularly, clinicians are encouraged to access the CDC website to obtain the most up-to-date information. (http://www.cdc.gov/STD/treatment).

        To prevent recurrent transmission, clinicians should ensure that all sexual partners of infected individuals are tested and treated if infected, or treated presumptively.

        Screening Intervals
        Screening for pregnant women who are at increased risk for chlamydial infection is recommended at the first prenatal visit. For pregnant women who remain at increased risk, and for those who acquire a new risk factor such as a new sexual partner, a screening should be conducted during the third trimester. The optimal interval for screening for non-pregnant women is unknown. The CDC recommends at least annual screening for women at increased risk.

        Suggestions for Practice in the Face of Insufficient Evidence Regarding Screening in Men
        The USPSTF concluded that the evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms related to screening men for chlamydial infection. Specifically, the USPSTF did not find evidence that screening programs that target men result in a decreased incidence of infection in women. The USPSTF notes that programs that screen men as a means of reducing transmission to women are not common practice, that primary care clinicians are capable of instituting screening in men, that the costs of additional screening tests per individual are relatively low, and that the potential harms of screening are small.

        The USPSTF recognizes that asymptomatic, untreated infections in men provide a reservoir of infection that may make it difficult to improve health outcomes in women through screening programs that target only women. However, given the low national rates of screening in women at risk, the USPSTF believes that clinicians and health care systems should focus on improving the screening rates among women at increased risk, a group in which the benefits of screening are certain.

        Other Approaches to Prevention
        Primary care clinicians and the health care systems in which they work are responsible for ensuring that asymptomatic women at risk for chlamydial infection are screened. In some communities, this may involve home- or school-based screening programs.


        BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)
        · U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chlamydial infection: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2007 Jul 17;147(2):128-34. [9 references] PubMed.

        SOURCE: National Guidelines Clearinghouse




      E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague   To print, use this version






      All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



      The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
         Feedback
      Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
      Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      Send