Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Vascular Disorders
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Vascular Disorders
    Electrocardiograph Errors Frequent in Diagnosing Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: Presented at AHA - (DGDispatch)
    Multivessel PCI Does Not Improve 1-Year Survival in Patients With Multivessel Disease: Presented at AHA - (DGDispatch)
    FDA: Avoid Coadministration of Clopidogrel and Omeprazole, Esomeprazole - (DGNews)
    Revascularization versus Medical Therapy for Renal-Artery Stenosis - (N Engl J Med)
    TopAbstracts in Vascular Disorders 11/12/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Vascular Disorders
      Arteriovenous Malformations Dural Arteriovenous Shunts
      Physiologic Basis of Hyperglycemia in Macro- and Microvascular Disease
      Varicose Veins: Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency
      Varicose Veins, the Orphan and the Clinician Radiologist
      Aortic Stenosis: Non-Surgical Replacement of the Stenotic Aortic Valve

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Vascular Disorders
        Coronary-pulmonary Artery Fistula with Anomalous Vessels Arising from the Right Coronary Sinus Detected by 64-MDCT
        A Simple and Rapid Vascular Anastomosis for Emergency Surgery: A Technical Case Report
        Ascending Aortic Aneurysm in a Patient with Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Positive History of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases and Common Genetic Factors: A Case Report
        Internal Jugular Vein Vascular Malformation Presenting as Mass at Root of Neck: A Case Report
        Leiomyosarcoma of the Inferior Vena Cava: Radical Surgery and Vascular Reconstruction

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > vascular disorders > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Rosiglitazone Not Significantly Better Than Glipizide in Reducing Coronary Plaque: Presented at AHA

          By Ed Susman

          NEW ORLEANS -- November 12, 2008 -- Use of rosiglitazone reduced total atheroma burden in coronary arteries as measured by intravascular ultrasound, while the sulfonylurea glipizide appeared to increased plaque in the blood vessels, according to research presented here at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions.

          However, the differences failed to reach statistical significance, said lead author Richard Nesto, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts.

          He presented the results of the Assessment on the Prevention of Progression by Rosiglitazone in Diabetes Patients With Cardiovascular History (APPROACH) in a late-breaking session on November 12.

          For their prospective, randomised, double-blind study, Dr. Nesto and colleagues enrolled 672 diabetic patients with an average age of 61, who were undergoing clinically required angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions.

          All patients underwent baseline intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluations of atherosclerotic plaque in arteries that were not subject to intervention. Patients were then randomised to 18 months of treatment with rosiglitazone or glipizide at dosages adjusted to achieve similar levels of glucose control.

          At the end of the treatment period, IVUS was performed on the same non-intervened arteries. A total of 462 patients completed the second evaluation.

          After 18 months of treatment, the change in percentage of plaque volume was a decrease of 0.21% in the patients taking rosiglitazone and an increase of 0.43% in the patients taking glipizide. The difference between the groups did not reach statistical significance (P = .12).

          Neither the reduction from baseline for rosiglitazone (P = .53) nor the increase from baseline for glipizide (P = .19) achieved statistical significance, he said. The direction of the differences was similar to results of a trial of glimepiride and pioglitazone, but in that study the differences reached statistical significance, Dr. Nesto said.

          Patients in both arms of the study gained weight while on treatment, he noted. The weight gain was about 2 kg among the glipizide patients and about 4.5 kg for patients on rosiglitazone.

          Funding for this study was provided by GlaxoSmithKline.


          [Presentation title: The APPROACH Trial: Effect of Rosiglitazone Versus Glipizide on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease. Abstract LBCT-5221]




        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send