Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Breast Cancer
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Breast Cancer
    Adding Common Genetic Variants to Breast Cancer Risk Models Offers Only Small Benefit - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Breast Cancer 03/16/2010 - (DGNews)
    Gene Test Receives Lukewarm Endorsement Into Breast Cancer Guidelines: Presented at NCCN - (DGDispatch)
    PET/CT Imaging Gets Cold Shoulder in Breast Cancer Guidelines: Presented at NCCN - (DGDispatch)
    Sentinel Node Biopsy Preferred in New Breast Cancer Guidelines: Presented at NCCN - (DGDispatch)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Breast Cancer
    • Current Research on New Treatments for Patients With Difficult-to-Treat Advanced Breast Cancer: An Interactive Discussion of Challenges, Opportunities, and Practical Considerations
    • Overcoming Challenges in Difficult-to-Treat Advanced Breast Cancer: What Are the Latest Advances?
    • Overcoming Challenges in Difficult-to-Treat Advanced Breast Cancer: How to Apply the Evidence to Clinical Practice?
    • Patient Scenarios for Everyday Practice: Managing Advanced HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Throughout the Disease Continuum
    • Surgical Margins in Breast Conservation Therapy: How Much Should We Excise?

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Breast Cancer
        Solitary Adrenal Metastasis From Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer: An Uncommon Finding
        Metastatic Breast Cancer Deluding As A Papular Skin Rash
        Breast Pseudotumoral Radionecrosis as a Late Radiation-Induced Injury: A Case Report
        Large Family with Both Parents Affected by Distinct BRCA1 Mutations: Implications for Genetic Testing
        Bilateral Swollen Eyelids Occurring During Adjuvant Treatment with Tamoxifen for Early Breast Cancer

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > breast cancer > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With Poor Performance Status Respond Well to Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine: Presented at SABCS

          By Charlene Laino

          SAN ANTONIO, Tex -- December 15, 2008 -- For patients with metastatic breast cancer who have poor performance status and who show resistance to anthracyclines and taxanes, ixabepilone plus capecitabine improves overall survival, progression-free survival, and tumour response compared with capecitabine alone, according to results of 2 large phase 3 studies, presented at the 31st Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS).

          Symptomatic metastatic breast cancer patients with poor performance status pose a difficult therapeutic challenge, due to a worse prognosis and greater risk of toxicity from chemotherapy than patients with good performance status, stated PierFranco Conte, MD, University Hospital, Modena, Italy, speaking at a poster presentation here on December 14.

          Dr. Conte and colleagues theorised that ixabepilone -- the first in a new class of antineoplastic agents -- plus capecitabine would offer a new option for such patients. The combination showed consistent clinical benefit compared with capecitabine alone in 2 large clinical trials of patients with metastatic breast cancer who had tumours resistant to anthracycline and a taxane (Thomas ES et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3399-3406) or pretreated with anthracycline and a taxane (Hortobagyi GN et al. 44th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO] 2008 Breast Cancer Symposium. Abstract 186).

          The researchers sought to better evaluate treatment effect in the subset of patients with a Karnofsky performance status of 70 to 80 by performing a predefined pooled analysis of findings from both the Thomas and Hortobagyi studies.

          Both studies had a similar design. A total of 1,973 patients with metastatic breast cancer who were previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane were randomised to receive ixabepilone (40 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours, every 3 weeks) plus oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice a day for 14 days, every 3 weeks) or oral capecitabine alone (1,250 mg/m2 twice a day for 14 days, every 3 weeks). A total of 606 (31%) patients in the 2 studies had a Karnofsky performance status of 70 to 80; of these, 314 received combination treatment and 292 received capecitabine alone.

          Outcome data on progression-free survival, overall survival, and tumour response were available for 268 patients in the combination arm and 257 patients in the capecitabine monotherapy arm. The median progression-free survival time was 4.6 months in the combination arm compared with 3.1 months in the capecitabine monotherapy arm. This finding corresponded to a 24% reduction in progression-free survival in the capecitabine arm (P = .0021).

          The median overall survival time was 12.3 months in the ixabepilone plus capecitabine arm versus 9.5 months in the capecitabine monotherapy arm. This finding corresponded to a 25% reduction in overall survival in the monotherapy arm (P = .0015).

          The overall response rate was 36% in the combination arm versus 19% in the capecitabine monotherapy arm. Specifically, in the combination arm, 2% of patients had a complete response, 34% had a partial response, and another 40% had stable disease. In the capecitabine monotherapy arm, there were no complete responders, and 19% of patients showed a partial response; another 37% of patients had stable disease.

          There was an increased incidence of adverse events, primarily neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy, associated with combination versus monotherapy, Dr. Conte said. Seventy-one percent of 310 patients in the combination arm for whom safety data were available developed grade 3/4 neutropenia compared with 11% of the 288 patients in the capecitabine monotherapy arm. Twenty-three percent of patients in the combination arm developed peripheral neuropathy compared with 1% in the monotherapy arm.

          Dr. Conte noted that the adverse events were generally manageable by dose reduction or interruption.

          "Ixabepilone plus capecitabine provides a new treatment option for symptomatic patients where the standard of care is single-agent sequential therapy," Dr. Conte concluded.

          Funding for this study was provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.


          [Presentation title: Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine Improves Overall Survival in Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracycline and Taxane in 2 Large Phase III Studies. Abstract 6114]




        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2010 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send