Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Breast Cancer
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Breast Cancer
    Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Cancer as Effective, Safe as Surgical Biopsy - (DGNews)
    Ketorolac Tromethamine Does Not Reduce Pain, Discomfort Associated With Mammograms: Presented at SABCS - (DGDispatch)
    Anthracycline-Docetaxel Chemo as Effective, but Less Toxic Than Anthracycline Polychemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Presented at SABCS - (DGDispatch)
    Zoledronic Acid Improves Bone Loss Associated With Adjuvant AI Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Presented at SABCS - (DGDispatch)
    TopAbstracts in Breast Cancer 12/15/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Breast Cancer

    Webcasts/CME archive

     Recent cases - Breast Cancer
      Breast Pseudotumoral Radionecrosis as a Late Radiation-Induced Injury: A Case Report
      Large Family with Both Parents Affected by Distinct BRCA1 Mutations: Implications for Genetic Testing
      Bilateral Swollen Eyelids Occurring During Adjuvant Treatment with Tamoxifen for Early Breast Cancer
      Ruptured Gallbladder as the First Presentation of Breast Cancer
      Synchronous Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma and Primary Extramedullary Plasmacytoma of the Breast

      Cases archive
        




      my personal edition > breast cancer > news
      divider

        E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague

      DGNews


      Screening Guidelines for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancers Expanded, Include Multiple Risk Categories

        HOUSTON, Tex -- October 26, 2009 -- Drawing on years of experience in cancer research and patient care, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, released today the most comprehensive, risk-based screening guidelines publicly available to date for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.

        The new recommendations represent the first wave of an effort by M. D. Anderson to improve the effectiveness of efforts to prevent and detect cancer at its earliest, most treatable stage by reconstructing and expanding its screening, risk reduction, and diagnostic guidelines across 8 disease sites.

        The recommendations translate best practices in cancer prevention employed at M. D. Anderson into accessible guidelines the public can follow, with risk categories identified and information about when to begin and discontinue screening exams.

        "Cancer screening is not one-size-fits-all," said Therese Bevers, MD, M. D. Anderson's Cancer Prevention Center. "Our new risk-based recommendations are markedly more personalised and precise, offering detailed guidance than what has previously been made available to the public here or by other cancer organisations."

        Until now, cancer screening recommendations were targeted largely to individuals at average risk for developing cancer based on characteristics like age, family history, or genetic predisposition. However, average risk was not previously defined and recommendations for individuals at increased or high risk were not outlined. The new screening guidelines define risk and offer recommendations for those at increased and high risk of developing cancer. For example, there are now 5 different sets of screening recommendations for those at increased risk for breast cancer; 4 categories of age-based risk recommendations for cervical cancer; and for colorectal cancer, there are 3 categories defining those at increased risk and 3 categories defining those at high risk.

        The new guidelines build on established cancer screening practices and now more specifically offer the following recommendations:

        Breast Cancer
        Starting at age 20, women at all risk levels should practice breast self-awareness by being familiar with how their breasts look and feel and immediately reporting any changes to their doctor. Women aged 40 years and older at average risk should get annual mammograms and breast exams.

        For women at increased risk, the type and frequency of exams -- including clinical breast exams, mammograms, and breast MRI -- depend on factors putting them at increased risk, including history of radiation treatment to the chest, genetic predisposition, diagnosis of lobular carcinoma in situ, Gail Model score of greater than 1.7%, or family history.

        Cervical Cancer
        For women at average risk, it is now recommended that women under age 21 get a liquid-based Pap test within 3 years of initiating vaginal intercourse. She should continue to have Pap tests annually until she has had 3 consecutive negative test results. After that, M. D. Anderson recommends screening every 2 years unless she is at increased risk of cervical cancer based on risk factors, including history of cervical cancer or severe cervical dysplasia, persistently testing positive for human papillomavirus (HPV), exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) before birth, HIV infection, or an immune system that does not function properly.

        Beginning at age 30, adding HPV testing is a preferred option to the Pap test, and if both are negative, a woman may go to every 3 years unless she is at increased risk based on the risk factors cited above or unless the optional HPV test was not done.

        Colorectal Cancer
        M. D. Anderson recommends a colonoscopy every 10 years (preferred screening), a virtual colonoscopy every 5 years, or a yearly faecal occult blood test for men and women aged 50 years and older who are at average risk. For men and women at increased or high risk, the type and frequency of exams -- including colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy -- depend on the following factors:

        · Personal history of adenomatous polyps
        · Personal history of colorectal cancer
        · Family history of colorectal cancer or adenomatous polyps
        · Genetic diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis
        · Genetic history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or a clinical history suggesting such
        · Inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease)
        ·
        "Because of the research being conducted in laboratories and clinics at M. D. Anderson and around the world, our understanding of how cancer develops and spreads is steadily increasing," said Ernest T. Hawk, MD, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, M. D. Anderson.

        More knowledge about how doctors make decisions about risk levels and screening tests will give patients a deeper understanding of the disease process and enable them to put their own cancer risk in perspective, he added.

        "For colorectal cancer screenings, patients need to be proactive about obtaining results from their screening tests. For example, if a colonoscopy reveals polyps, it is critical for the patient to know what kind, how many, and what size, since this information factors heavily into what risk category they fall into for colorectal cancer," Dr. Bevers said.

        The risk categories and related guidelines were developed by multidisciplinary panels of M. D. Anderson disease site experts across several areas, including medical oncology, surgical oncology, cancer prevention, imaging, and others. Risk-based screening guidelines for prostate, liver, skin, endometrial, and ovarian cancers are currently in development and a new online risk assessment tool integrating the new screening guidelines will be launched on the M. D. Anderson Web site in early 2010.


        SOURCE: University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center




      E-Mail this DGNews to a colleague   To print, use this version






      All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



      The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
         Feedback
      Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
      Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      Send