Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Head and Neck Cancer
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Head and Neck Cancer
    TopAbstracts in Head and Neck Cancer 02/04/2010 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Head and Neck Cancer 01/26/2010 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Head and Neck Cancer 01/07/2010 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Head and Neck Cancer 12/24/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Head and Neck Cancer 12/10/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Head and Neck Cancer
      Surgical Advances in Head and Neck Cancer

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Head and Neck Cancer
        Basal Cell Adenocarcinoma of a Hard Palate Minor Salivary Gland: Case Report and Review of the Literature
        Basaloid Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Two Case Reports
        Incidental Detection Of An Occult Oral Malignancy With Autofluorescence Imaging: A Case Report
        X-Ray Treatment To The Face And Neck In Infancy Leading To Multiple Pathologies In Later Life: A Case Report
        Polymorphous Low-Grade Adenocarcinoma Of The Tongue: A Case Report

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > head and neck cancer > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Intensity-Modulated Radiation Offers Treatment Advantages Over Conventional Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Presented at ASTRO

          By John Otrompke

          CHICAGO -- November 10, 2009 -- Patients treated with simultaneously integrated boost treatment using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) experience better overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence rates, as well as decreased dermatitis and better postoperative salivary function that those treated with conventional radiation.

          "IMRT treatment was described as 'boosted' because we use 2 different doses in the same patient, who gets a dose of 2.12 gy to 1 part of their anatomy, while another part gets 1.8 gy," said Sebastien Clavel, MD, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, on November 3 at the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) 51st Annual Meeting.

          In the study, 249 patients with stage III and IV oropharyngeal carcinoma were treated between 2000 and 2007. Of these, 100 received IMRT, while 149 patients received conventional radiation therapy.

          After a 33-month median follow-up, 95.4% of those treated with IMRT were still alive, compared with 75.8% of those in the conventional arm. Disease-free survival was 89.3% for the IMRT group, compared with 71.6% in the conventional radiation arm.

          In addition, local control was 92.4% in the IMRT patients, compared with 85.3% in the conventional group.

          "With the old technique, the rays were shooting from both sides, whereas with IMRT, the rays come from all directions," said Dr. Clavel. "When using IMRT, we also always give them a 3-mm margin with the skin, both of which result in fewer cases of dermatitis." IMRT patients experienced a 20% decrease in dermatitis grades 3 and 4.

          "If we are able to treat the tumour with IMRT while avoiding the structure of the parotid gland, which produces saliva, the patients can live better, because more saliva is useful to protect the teeth, to eat, and swallow," he added, noting that only 8% of those treated with IMRT experience grade 3 or 4 xerostomia at 2 years following treatment, compared with 80% of those treated with conventional radiation.

          Better salivary function was also associated with increased weight regain post operatively. "Patients lost 10% of their weight during treatment; while they did not gain all their weight back in the IMRT group, they were able to regain up to 50% more than those treated with conventional radiation," said Dr. Clavel.

          [Presentation title: A Comparison of Simultaneously Integrated Boost Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Conventional Radiation Therapy in the Setting of Concomitant Carboplatin and 5-Fluorouracil for Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. Abstract 69]




        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2010 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send