Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Angina Pectoris/MI
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Angina Pectoris/MI
    Rosuvastatin Approved for US Adults With No Clinically Evident Cardiovascular Disease - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Angina Pectoris/MI 02/03/2010 - (DGNews)
    Myocardial infarction and stroke associated with diuretic based two drug antihypertensive regimens: population based case-control study - (BMJ)
    Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis - (BMJ)
    FDA's Safety Review of Sibutramine Warrants New Contraindication Label - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Angina Pectoris/MI
      Keys to Successful Outcomes from Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy: Addressing Medication Therapy Management Issues
      Cardiovascular Series: Guidelines for Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy in the Prevention and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Incorporation into Clinical Practice
      Translating Evidence-Based Guidelines into Clinical Practice in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome
      Advancing the Standard of Care: Cardiovascular and Neurovascular Emergencies
      Anti-inflammatory and Anti-atherogenic Effects of Insulin

      Webcasts/CME archive

       Recent cases - Angina Pectoris/MI
        Late Restenosis Related To Cypher Stent Fracture
        Acute Perimyocarditis Mimicking Transmural Myocardial Infarction
        Successful Percutaneous Intervention to Acute Myocardial Infarction Presenting With Typical Chest Pain in Transplanted Heart
        Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease: A Case-Based Approach
        Multislice Computed Tomography for Comprehensive Assessment of the Heart in Acute Chest Pain: A Case Report

        Cases archive
          




        my personal edition > angina pectoris/mi > news
        divider

          E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague

        DGDispatch


        Patients Receive High Levels of Radiation During Diagnostic Testing for Acute MI: Presented at AHA

        By Ed Susman

        ORLANDO, Fla -- November 17, 2009 -- Patients suffering an acute myocardial infarction (MI) accumulate high levels of radiation as they undergo potentially life-saving diagnostic and therapeutic treatments, researchers reported at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2009.

        "We estimate that one series of tests can result in an average heart attack patient receiving 14.5 millisieverts [mSv] of radiation -- about 30% of what radiation workers are allowed to accumulate in a year," explained Prashant Kaul, MD, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, speaking at an oral presentation here on November 16.

        Dr. Kaul said the level of radiation may or may not be considered high, assuming that diagnostic treatment is required urgently, and catheterisation and computed tomography (CT) scans routinely pinpoint cardiovascular problems in the acute-care setting.

        "We thought we should remind doctors that ionising radiation does have a theoretical risk to the patient, and doctors might keep that in mind when ordering and performing tests that use radiation," said Dr. Kaul.

        In the first large study to examine total radiation dosage in patients having heart attacks, researchers found those admitted to academic hospitals had a cumulative effective radiation dose of 14.5 mSv. "It's potentially a new way to consider radiation exposure and safety," said Dr. Kaul. "We think physicians should not only have a greater awareness of dose accumulation from the tests they are ordering, but also understand the testing patterns they use for common diagnoses."

        In this study, Dr. Kaul and colleagues analysed data from 64,074 patients, including 23,394 women and 40,680 men who were being treated for acute MI between 2006 and the second quarter of 2009. The data were collected from 49 academic hospitals throughout the United States that participate in the University Health System Consortium and subscribe to their resource manager database.

        The researchers found that patients received 276,651 tests using ionising radiation -- an average of 7 per patient. Patients averaged a total accumulation of 14.52 mSv during their hospital stay.

        Among the 9 types of tests analysed, 83% of all patients received chest x-rays; 77% had catheter procedures; 15% underwent body CT scans; and 12% had a head CT. Between 1% and 6% of patients had 3 other nuclear imaging tests and chest CT.

        "These figures are probably conservative," noted Robert Bonow, MD, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, and a spokesperson for the AHA. "In particularly complicated catheter or angioplasty and stent placement procedures, the radiation exposure might be considerable greater."

        Dr. Bonow added that "all physicians should avoid giving patients unnecessary radiation tests."

        Funding for this study was provided by Duke University Division of Cardiovascular Medicine.

        [Presentation title: The Average Ionizing Radiation Exposure to Patients Admitted With Acute Myocardial Infarction in 2008. Abstract 998]



        E-Mail this DGDispatch to a colleague   To print, use this version






        All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2010 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



        The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
           Feedback
        Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
        Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        Send