Scroll Up
Scroll Down
Play Play Play Play
Unregistered User
Click here if this is not your Personal Edition
 
Contact Us | Free E-Mail Updates | Journals | Register a colleague
 
 
Breast Cancer
 
   
 
SEARCH   
Doctor's Guide Free CME
Medline
Congress Resource Centre
 

 EXPLORE :
   Most Read News
 All News  All News
 All Webcasts / CME  All Webcasts / CME
 All Cases  All Cases
 Congress Resource Centre  Congress Resource Centre
 All Medical Resources  All Medical Resources
 Medical  My Personal Edition



Warning | Privacy

 

 
 Recent news - Breast Cancer
    Metabolic Factors May Play a Role in Risk for Breast Cancer - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Breast Cancer 06/30/2009 - (DGNews)
    Protein-Bound Paclitaxel Suspension Approved in Quebec for Metastatic Breast Cancer - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Breast Cancer 06/23/2009 - (DGNews)
    TopAbstracts in Breast Cancer 06/16/2009 - (DGNews)

    News archive

     Recent webcasts/CME - Breast Cancer
  • Optimizing the Use of Chemotherapy as the Backbone of Breast Cancer Treatment: An Update of the Latest Evidence
  • Applying Key Biomarkers in Oncology: From Biospecimen Preparation and Storage to Clinical Implications
  • Finding Ways to Prevent, Circumvent, or Overcome Cardiovascular Toxicity Associated With Modern Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Cutaneous Metastasis of Breast Carcinoma Presenting as Alopecia Neoplastica

    Webcasts/CME archive

     Recent cases - Breast Cancer
      Bilateral Swollen Eyelids Occurring During Adjuvant Treatment with Tamoxifen for Early Breast Cancer
      Ruptured Gallbladder as the First Presentation of Breast Cancer
      Synchronous Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma and Primary Extramedullary Plasmacytoma of the Breast
      Primary Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma of the Breast Arising in Reconstruction Mammoplasty Capsule of Saline Filled Breast Implant after Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: An Unusual Case Presentation
      The Radiologic Workup of a Palpable Breast Mass

      Cases archive
        




      my personal edition > breast cancer > news
      divider

        E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague

      DGReview


      Guidelines Define Tumour Markers For Improved Breast Cancer Care

      A DGReview of :"Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for tumor markers in breast cancer"
      Bulletin du Cancer

      11/27/2000
      By David Loshak


      A major long-term French project has developed new recommendations for breast cancer tumour marking to improve the management of patients with the disease.

      They come from the Standards, Options and Recommendations project launched by French cancer centres and specialists in 1993.

      The guidelines were derived from literature reviews and critical appraisal by experts in various disciplines with feedback from oncologists. They define the characteristics of different tumour markers in breast cancer and their potential role in patient management.

      They identify the mucin antigen CA 15.3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as the serum tumour markers most often used in breast cancer. If the CA 15.3 is raised at presentation, the guidelines say, there is no place for the measurement of other tumour markers.

      All analyses for each patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique. CA 15.3 should not be used for screening.

      Although the CA 15.3 level before treatment is a recognised prognostic factor, its independent value has not been proven, the guidelines note.

      They indicate that if the initial value of CA 15.3 exceeds 50 kU.L-1, no treatment decisions should be made until disseminated disease has been actively sought.

      They also say that an initial elevation of CA 15.3 that does not return to normal reflects a lack of response to treatment -- it is a strongly adverse prognostic factor.

      The guidelines point out that although tumour markers, especially CA 15.3, are known to be accurate early indicators of metastatic disease, the clinical benefit has not been established.

      The recommendations also draw attention to a correlation between tumour markers and clinical response in treating metastatic disease. However, the level of CA 15.3 in metastatic disease does not predict response to treatment.
      "Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for tumor markers in breast cancer"

      E-Mail this DGReview to a colleague   To print, use this version






      All contents Copyright (c) 1995-2009 Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.



      The NTK initiative. Physicians helping physicians identify Need-To-Know science
         Feedback
      Please rate this article: Strongly DISAGREE...Strongly AGREE NTK logo
      Question 1 - Physicians need to become aware of this information as soon as possible. Question 2 - This information is likely to have an impact on the way physicians practice medicine.
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      Send